or to join or start a new Discussion

40 Comments
Article Rating 1 Star

Uruguay 6m population, England 70m

It's embarrassing watching a small country like Uruguay embarrassing England again, next, Costa rica population 3 million will likely finish England. We have no structure, confidence or passion to succeed in football, sad.

posted on 20/6/14

comment by Arouna Jagielka oooh I wanna take ya, Heitinga Nikica come on pretty mama (U1308)
posted 12 seconds ago
My mistake...

India, why are they only 5th in their national game?

Australia with just 22M population are No.1

Just goes to show the quantity doesnt = quality
----------------------------------------------------------------------

To an extent I can accept being beaten by a country with a much smaller population than us if they have a genuine football pedigree as Uruguay do.

posted on 20/6/14

Australia are awful in soccer, they have consistently been knocked out of WC and they are good in that Aussie rule thing.

posted on 20/6/14

comment by Dr Huss is the name (U19676)
posted 57 seconds ago
Australia are awful in soccer, they have consistently been knocked out of WC and they are good in that Aussie rule thing.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Not surprising when it's probably their 5th sport (at best).

comment by Spurtle (U1608)

posted on 20/6/14

comment by Sömeday_693 - Källström will be our salvation (U8892)
posted 4 minutes ago
comment by Spurtle2 (U1608)
posted 8 seconds ago
comment by Arouna Jagielka oooh I wanna take ya, Heitinga Nikica come on pretty mama (U1308)
posted 52 seconds ago
comment by Spurtle2 (U1608)




posted 3 minutes ago



comment by palmers_spur (U8896)
posted 2 minutes ago
Using population stats to determine how good a country should be at football is plain stupid

on that basis, China, India, Indonesia and Pakistan should all have brilliant football teams
----------------------------------------------------------------------
But we know for a fact we take football more seriously than those countries, so population should be used against England to show how overwhelmingly poor we really are.


==

They are also cricket mad in Bangladesh so should be the No.1 ranked team in the world?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
They're a lot better at cricket than football. I don't watch a lot of cricket but I'm guessing they might be better than us at it given our recent results. Probably give us a run for our money in the football too.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Not likely on either front, Bangladesh remain undoubtedly the worst side playing test cricket (however low the West Indies try to fall).
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I guess Bangladesh are the England of Asia then - p!ss poor at their number one sport. Oh well we're not alone then, that's comforting.

posted on 20/6/14

Uruguay have 3.mill population...

posted on 20/6/14

comment by Sömeday_693 - Källström will be our salvation (U8892)



posted 9 minutes ago


comment by Arouna Jagielka oooh I wanna take ya, Heitinga Nikica come on pretty mama (U1308)
posted 12 seconds ago
My mistake...

India, why are they only 5th in their national game?

Australia with just 22M population are No.1

Just goes to show the quantity doesnt = quality
----------------------------------------------------------------------

To an extent I can accept being beaten by a country with a much smaller population than us if they have a genuine football pedigree as Uruguay do.


==

Yet people are shocked that a country with a small population and a football pedigree beat england who only won the WC at home!

comment by Spurtle (U1608)

posted on 20/6/14

comment by Arouna Jagielka oooh I wanna take ya, Heitinga Nikica come on pretty mama (U1308)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by Sömeday_693 - Källström will be our salvation (U8892)



posted 9 minutes ago


comment by Arouna Jagielka oooh I wanna take ya, Heitinga Nikica come on pretty mama (U1308)
posted 12 seconds ago
My mistake...

India, why are they only 5th in their national game?

Australia with just 22M population are No.1

Just goes to show the quantity doesnt = quality
----------------------------------------------------------------------

To an extent I can accept being beaten by a country with a much smaller population than us if they have a genuine football pedigree as Uruguay do.


==

Yet people are shocked that a country with a small population and a football pedigree beat england who only won the WC at home!
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I wouldn't say shocked. More annoyed. Uruguay were always a good team and we knew it was a tough group. I guess people expected a bit more from England after the Italy performance but they went backwards.

posted on 20/6/14

comment by MMaaxx (U9506)

posted on 20/6/14

Sad thing about England is that they have the population, money and passion for the game yet.....

Belgium, Netherlands, Portugal, Uruguay manage to produce world class talent and get far in tournaments

posted on 20/6/14

Isnt the population of England about 48m and the UK 70m, which includes Scotland, Wales and NI?

So its a country of 48m whooped by a country of 6m

Sign in if you want to comment
RATE THIS ARTICLE
Rate Breakdown
5
0 Votes
4
0 Votes
3
0 Votes
2
0 Votes
1
0 Votes

Average Rating: 1 from 1 vote

ARTICLE STATS
Day
Article RankingNot Ranked
Article ViewsNot Available
Average Time(mins)Not Available
Total Time(mins)Not Available
Month
Article RankingNot Ranked
Article ViewsNot Available
Average Time(mins)Not Available
Total Time(mins)Not Available