Pulis has gone before even a ball has been kicked. Is this a sign of an even more aggressive approach by owners than previously? Pochettino had better watch out!
Browse:
comment by Jay. (U16498)
posted on 15/8/14
I think Pulis walked. I've seen somewhere that there were promises about signings that never materialised.
That said, he could have gone 2 months ago and given someone else a chance to get in to it.
comment by Mr. Unsubscribe (U1110)
posted on 15/8/14
Comment Deleted by Site Moderator
comment by Mr. Unsubscribe (U1110)
posted on 15/8/14
Comment Deleted by Site Moderator
posted on 15/8/14
I read that it was 'mutual consent'. I think that normally means the manager is given his orders.
comment by Jay. (U16498)
posted on 15/8/14
comment by To the Max (U17518)
posted 1 minute ago
I read that it was 'mutual consent'. I think that normally means the manager is given his orders.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It could also be Palace wanting to save face. Unless Pulis was making unrealistic demands based on last season's performance? Maybe they wanted to get rid because he wanted too much?
comment by Be A Grizzly (U2206)
posted on 15/8/14
How does this "mutual consent" work?
Chairman : "I think you're a crap manager, and we could get someone better."
Manager : "Yes, you're quite right, I suck. Cheerio"
comment by Jay. (U16498)
posted on 15/8/14
It's more
'I think you should leave'
'I think I should leave, but only if you give me money'
comment by Be A Grizzly (U2206)
posted on 15/8/14
I wish I worked somewhere where if I was rubbish at my job, they would give me bundles of cash to not work there anymore.
posted on 15/8/14
comment by Be A Grizzly (U2206)
posted 12 minutes ago
I wish I worked somewhere where if I was rubbish at my job, they would give me bundles of cash to not work there anymore.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Indeed! Football is a world apart in so many ways. Have to keep going though - can't let all that crap ruin what is the best game out there.
comment by iCraft uGraft (U1193)
posted on 15/8/14
comment by Jay. (U16498)
posted 1 hour, 7 minutes ago
comment by To the Max (U17518)
posted 1 minute ago
I read that it was 'mutual consent'. I think that normally means the manager is given his orders.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It could also be Palace wanting to save face. Unless Pulis was making unrealistic demands based on last season's performance? Maybe they wanted to get rid because he wanted too much?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
This. Pulis wanted to spend £9m on Connor Wickham. Palace said no, because they know Pulis is bad with money. So he walked.
Good ownership if you ask me.
RATE THIS ARTICLE
ARTICLE STATS
Day
Article RankingNot Ranked
Article ViewsNot Available
Average Time(mins)Not Available
Total Time(mins)Not Available
Month
Article RankingNot Ranked
Article ViewsNot Available
Average Time(mins)Not Available
Total Time(mins)Not Available