With Vorm and Davies swapping clubs with Siggy and Carroll (albeit on loan) and seemingly no money exchanging hands, who's actually got the better deal.
Swansea get a youngster on loan who should slot perfectly into their philosophy and a goalscoring midfielder in Siggy which could be vital to them staying up. In return spurs have a back up keeper and Davies who whilst young and talented might be rotating the left back position with rose this season.
So in my opinion Swansea have strengthened significantly and probably have had the better deal overall.
What are your thoughts?
Who's had the better deal. Swansea or Spurs
posted on 22/8/14
Spurs...addressed the areas we desperately needed strengthening while offloaded players in overloaded positions (mid).
Might want to put this in our board
posted on 22/8/14
Comment Deleted by Article Creator
posted on 22/8/14
Swansea gained more but Spurs lost less, if that makes sense
posted on 22/8/14
You can have your cake and eat it too.
posted on 22/8/14
How many keepers do spurs want?
I rate Siggy but I also think Davies could become a good player.
posted on 22/8/14
Lloris first choice, Vorm back up and Friedel moving eventually into a coaching position...what's wrong with that?
posted on 23/8/14
I agree that Swansea strengthened more overall but we got a good deal too considering we'll get Carroll back, and the price of home grown left backs
posted on 23/8/14
Carroll getting a season with a good PL club who play a decent style of football is a good deal for us (Spurs).
It'll give us a good idea of whether he has what it takes to make it with us with no risk on our part by playing him.
posted on 8/11/14
Comment Deleted by Site Moderator