3 game ban stands. Thats ridiculous. Not even a red card offence imo, tho i can understand why the ref sent him off. 1 game ban would be sufficient.
Saying that, whitts has been poor. Young mcmillan showed whitts how its done yday. He was excellent, as was wallace at left back.
whittaker loses appeal.
posted on 22/8/11
"By that, you suggested, that having watched McMillan for 90 competitive minutes, he is capable of challenging Whittaker for the RB berth"
Is THAT what I meant?
" ...he is capable of challenging Whittaker for the RB berth..."
" that having watched McMillan for 90 competitive minutes"
Are you saying he wasn't competitive against Chelsea?
Are you saying he's not capable of mounting a challenge???
Jessy, you need to find a new hobby. One where people don't laugh at you.
posted on 22/8/11
Chelsea was NOT a competitive match...do you not know the difference???? They would have been in double figures if so
+++++++
Is THAT what I meant
So what did you mean
posted on 22/8/11
Jessy... are you now saying you cannot judge a player unless they are playing in a competitive match??
Somebody wants to tell the Lurgan Loon that; he has dozens of trialists wasting their time out at Lennoxtown.
"So what did you mean"
I meant what I wrote... that's why I wrote it. Let McMillan and Whittaker fight for the position. I'M not saying who is better or who is worse... that is what the fighting for the place will decide.
Oh dear... I think I'll let this one go now, Jessy. You are tedious/thick in extremis.
Pffft
posted on 22/8/11
I meant what I wrote... that's why I wrote it. Let McMillan and Whittaker fight for the position. I'M not saying who is better or who is worse... that is what the fighting for the place will decide.
+++++
Which is exactly what I said.That having watched a youngster for 90 mins, YOU cannot judge one as being better than the other.Not the kind of appraisal a player of Whittaker's experience would welcome, considering the manager has recently awarded him a multi- million pound deal
posted on 22/8/11
"YOU cannot judge one as being better than the other"
I never judged.. I said they could fight for the position.. THAT will decide who gets it... not me.
"Which is exactly what I said"
No it isn't... you wrote... "..considering there was a young player who could fill his void".
Jessy... go away, son.
posted on 22/8/11
I'M not saying who is better or who is worse... that is what the fighting for the place will decide.
+++++
YOU cannot judge one as being better than the other
Honestly, are you mental???
posted on 22/8/11
Oh dear.
Jessy - Check
Short plank - Check
Can I tell them apart?
Naw.
posted on 22/8/11
If as you say, you do not know who is better between McMillan and Whittaker, having watched the youngster for a mere 90 competitive mins, that the manager was reckless in awarding Whittaker such an enticing contract, since Broadfoot is already there as cover.
Is it beyond your intelligence or pride, to accept that, having awarded Whittaker such a lucrative contract, the manager will more than likely give him the nod????
Has Whittaker been one of your worst players so far this season?????
Are you mental
posted on 22/8/11
"If as you say, you do not know who is better between McMillan and Whittaker, having watched the youngster for a mere 90 competitive mins, that the manager was reckless in awarding Whittaker such an enticing contract, since Broadfoot is already there as cover."
That's some sentence.
Does it go on to say anything?
Pffft
posted on 22/8/11
<wibble>