for sponsorship deals? "Arsenal's shirt sponsorship (Emirates) worth £6m a yr to 2014 & money already spent on stadium. Man Utd earn circa £30m a yr for similar" Tim payton
We don't have a wealthy owner so you'd expect the board to get the best out of the club's revenue streams.
Why are we getting ripped off so badly
posted on 22/8/11
Even lowly Liverpool have a multimillion pound deal for shirt sponsership?
posted on 22/8/11
When the deal started you weren't getting ripped off but Arsenal seem to have a thing for contracts that are too long to be seen out properly, now United are getting sponsored more for their training kit than Arsenal are for their actual kit
posted on 22/8/11
now United are getting sponsored more for their training kit than Arsenal are for their actual kit
I'd say this fella Kroenke will sort out stuff like that when he gets going.
posted on 22/8/11
When the deal started you weren't getting ripped off but Arsenal seem to have a thing for contracts that are too long to be seen out properly,
---
We needed that long-term shirt/stadium naming deal to finance the move. Didn't have a lot of choice at the time it seemed.
posted on 22/8/11
but Didnt emirates help fund move to new stadium? Im sure i heard someone mention that once.
posted on 22/8/11
Because the deals were front-loaded.
posted on 22/8/11
comment by TheSkins (U3865)
posted 23 minutes ago
When the deal started you weren't getting ripped off but Arsenal seem to have a thing for contracts that are too long to be seen out properly,
---
We needed that long-term shirt/stadium naming deal to finance the move. Didn't have a lot of choice at the time it seemed.
-----------------
It was a pop at Fabregas