Serious question..
Herrera, Mata,Young, Valencia, Januzaj,Di Maria, Rooney,Van Persie, Falcao.
OR...
Fabregas, Oscar, Salah, Schurrle, Willian, Hazard, Remy, Drogba, Costa.
Who Would You Rather Have?
posted on 3/9/14
Comment Deleted by Site Moderator
posted on 3/9/14
Comment Deleted by Site Moderator
posted on 3/9/14
Calls me pretentious and then uses the word hybrid for Arsenal
posted on 3/9/14
No more, soft lad. No more. According to you. The only pace we have at Arsenal is from just Sanchez and Walcott.
This is clearly not your subject.
posted on 3/9/14
Comment Deleted by Site Moderator
posted on 3/9/14
Comment Deleted by Site Moderator
posted on 3/9/14
I’d agree with that Gazza, Chelsea clearly had an idea of the team they wanted to build and have gone out and done that flawlessly. United (as we did around the time we let Ballack and co all go) have neglected the upkeep of their squad over several seasons and are now paying the price, you need to be on top of potential problems before they arise, not react to them to remain completive. From where I am United have thrown money at the best players available, not built a team. It does smack of panic but they’ve also picked up some wonderful players along the way. It is a clear signal of intent but I don’t see them as title rivals, for this season at least. And given a defence takes another year to get right probably not next season either, they will be back in the mix before long though and I think we’ll steady improvement, top for this season and top three next.
One thing will be key, how City continue once this current squad is over the hill, everyone questioned what would happen to Chelsea once ‘Roman got bored’, well he seems to love it as much now as day one, of course City are not a one man show but I wonder what their motivation is? Will they continue as quite the force they are now and remain a top 2 club for the next decade?
posted on 3/9/14
t probably gives you variation as you can play a multitude of different styles but no team has ever really been successful without a clear footballing direction/style.
-------
Man United in the last few years under Fergie did. We did have a set style as we had many different players differing in style as well as Fergie being a lot more pragmatic in terms of our attacking approach.
LVG ain't no Fergie, though. So it may not work for him. But I reckon he's got a vision for the team. Whether the players can adapt to that remains to be seen. And this is the key issue. Our squad overall is probably stronger now than it was in the last couple of years under Fergie, but we are coming from a different starting point.
Hopefully things will start to click soon, especially in attack, as there's a lot of attacking talent there.
posted on 3/9/14
Comment Deleted by Site Moderator
posted on 3/9/14
I think one of the problems we have is that we've lost quite a few players, then more needed moving on, so the squad was unbalanced and it looks like he's trying to juggle what we have as well as bringing in players that can fit the system for the future.
That's why it's no surprise that most of them are versatile players.
Falcao is the only one I don't really understand the vision for. The rest I do. But I think the opportunity was too good to pass up.