For the minority

I respect your view,but many unionists across the UK are passionate about our nations staying united,so the yes camp does not monopolize romantic notions or "dreams".

I feel that Westminster is being snide,with regard to Brown's promises,but that is Tory v Labour politics,and we all know it is messy.

http://youtu.be/EPSxTDJeQ9I



X

schiz

True mate,and many financial queries such as currency,and control of the money were not answered by yesser's,who just said they woud use the pound...........this would have required negotiation with Westminster and the Bank of England.
Europe,defence,NATO,passports,NHS funding,Students from England getting loans etc were also issues not adequately analysed and answered by the yes camp,imo.

CG

Good aul Supertramp

CG ,,You said goodnight




but,

comment by I'm not as think as you drunk I am.......... (U2115)
posted 19 minutes ago
And if the "dreamers" come back with answers and solutions rather than "it'll be alright" and "of course we'll manage"....then they may well win.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Not liking an answer is different from not having answers.

I fully respect people who voted No out of reasoned thought. DeBear, CT etc

However those who stuck their fingers in their ears and refused to read into it annoyed me and no I am not saying it's all No voters who did that.

Murney

Both camps had narrow minded and ignorant voters,and that is the democratic process,in action.

Not all yesser's were political scientists,and many unionists studied the subject.

Night folks.

Take it easy.

So the unionists were " political scientists"?

Hmmmmmm

Actually ath that's my exact job description.