Apologies for putting a bit of a damper on a good weekend.
MattyP had a go at me in regards to my claims about the goals against, he also claimed I was proven wrong, then claimed I'm a liar.
Geldered, obviously saw another opportunity and jumped on Mattyp's bandwagon, nothing unusual for Geldered.
Games below are the goals that have come from the Pearce / Warnock side, Pearce side and/or involved Pearce.
Goals against = 26------Penalties against 6
What Mattyp said
"Have done.
and someone else, I believe it was Faith, has already posted a break down of these goals.
Yet you still continue this, and lets be honest it has now got to the stage where I can call it this, lie about Warnock and Pearce being at fault.
The goals are against you (follow your own advice and watch them)
the stats are against you
Fans that actually watch these players are against you.
Yet you keep on with your lies in order to attack two of our playe"
Geldered's usual attempt to bring me down..........
"Haha you are quite ridiculous Luvr, but it is amusing!
I don't know whether you have noticed but a few people of late have started to see through and call you out on it, and I imagine the rest are just too nice and polite to dig you out!
So please, tell me all these things I've been wrong about?
Tactical racism?
Noel Hunts double last season?
Ross being no good?
Want me to go on?"
Please do Geldered, there's another 1000 examples you haven't covered yet.
Brighton 2 - 1x Pearce foul
Watford 1 - Pearce / Warnock side
Millwall 1 - Pearce / Warnock side
Bradford 1 - Pearce / Warnock side
Wolves 2 - Pearce / Warnock side
Norwich 1 - Pearce / Warnock side (goal from middle, cross from Pearce / Warnock side) arguable.
Cardiff 1 - Pearce / Warnock side
Bourne 1 - Pearce / Warnock side
sheff W 1 - Pearce / Warnock side
Rotherham 1 - Pearce / Warnock side
Brentford 2 - Pearce / Warnock side (add the missed penalty caused by Pearce)
Blackburn 1 - Pearce side (switched positions)
Blackpool 1 - Pearce side (switched positions)
That's 16 goals against.
I understand that some may be arguable based on perception.
Maybe HFL was looking at last seasons goals, but it does conjure up strong suspicion as to whether HFL and Mattyp did actually check the goals against.
They're on youtube and dailymotion for all to analyse.
So, HFL, Mattyp, Geldered.......here's to egg on your face, again.
Leeds goals against
posted on 1/12/14
"So please, tell me all these things I've been wrong about?"
Tactical racism?
my reply,
Tactical racism is exactly what it says. The use of offending words to upset, make angry or throw a person of their game.
You obviously don't know the meaning of the word tactical Geldered.
Noel Hunts double last season?
My reply,
I put my hand up on that one, I got the names mixed up.
I'm sure everyone's more the wiser for the vintage history lesson Geldered.
It does show that tactically, you have nothing if you have to keep going way back in history to try and turn others against me...............you obviously do know what tactics mean, you naughty boy.
Ross being no good?
My reply,
I never said McContract was no good. I believe I said, in a team with more than one striker, McContract wouldn't score as many......a point that is being proven at moment.
Want me to go on?"
my reply,
Yes, please do old bean, you only brought up 3 of about 1000 examples of you being wrong.
Grab that shovel Geldered, keep digging..........
posted on 1/12/14
Apologies HFL, I didn't mean to leave you out.
"And I am interested to know which is the one howler Bellusci has been involved in Luvr?"
http://www.dailymotion.com/video/x293ynv_cardiff-v-leeds-united-lufc_sport
I hope you're feeling better now HFL......
posted on 1/12/14
Luvr,
Don't remember this Bellusci met then, or was this Pearce's fault?!
I will watch the goals again when I have time and put it in more detail
posted on 1/12/14
Does it matter? We've won. Could be the turning point in this season......
Onwards and upwards.
MOT
(And Redfearn hasn't been replaced yet )
posted on 1/12/14
One individual has been calling me a liar on here for a while but never quite manages to provide the evidence to support it. Doesn't have time for trawling yet everything that he posts is based on trawling. Perhaps the best indicator of his true personality is that he's filtered me, I can't respond or challenge. I'm at an age where I think life's too short.
Above all else we are all Leeds United fans. I genuinely believe that 99% want success. That should be applauded.
MOT
posted on 1/12/14
Oh my god!
So the next time I want to wind someone up at work who is of another race, ill just call them a throwaway racist word to 'get under their skin'.
That will show them. Unbelievable.
posted on 1/12/14
I dont know or care what the argument is about but the Cooper /Bellusci combination is the best for balance one right foot one left footed player and in Cooper we have the makings of a new Paul Madeley
posted on 1/12/14
Where to start...
Okay lets start here
"I understand that some may be arguable based on perception."
What the above statement actually means, is I'll load my answers by switching and changing the start point to a point at which the ball was somewhere near Pearce as I hate him and as a result will do what ever I can to make him look bad.
This is seen with the fact you change your reference points for some of the goals. but not others For the Blakburn goals for example, (you have these listed as twice so I assume you mean both Blackburn goals).
Now the debate with the first goal is clearly who go it wrong out of Silvestri and Cooper, should Cooper have cleared it better or should have Silvestri not come for it, if that was the debate its a good and interesting one, no one would really argue that one of those two were not at fault. Its a mistake, but these things happen and hopefully they can learn from it. Hey personally I see it as one of those 6 of 1 half a dozen of another type situations, both at fault.
However as you hate Pearce you move goal posts (as it were) and change your start point and claim the ball switched sides so infact it was scored on the Pearce Warnock side or at the very least they were responsible for another defenders clanger.
You do this on some of your goals and not others, end result you load your answers to suit your own ends, which makes your opinion total and utter rubbish.
I'm not surprised that you have done this, but either you are consistent or you are just a biased idiot.
Now I suppose it would be possible to go on through and have a look at each one and see if I can figure out at exactly what point you decide to change your blame point to, but its a waste of time, because, and lets be honest here, you wont bother responding with anything and will just slink off as you have done on a couple of threads now.
What you do is you try to change most threads to an attack on Pearce and Warnock. Perfect example being LIWs new signings rating thread which you conveniently "misread," but hey you can never turn down a chance to attack a couple of our players will you
Then as soon as you are provided with evidence you are wrong slink off and don't respond, I have no reason to believe that this thread will be any different, I don't know what else you can do though, maybe you could now go off to make an omelet, after all you have to do something with all that face egg you have.
Oh and I forgot, in between your constant attacks on Pearce and Warnock you of course spend much of the rest of your time having a go at Jonty for his anti MC rhetoric. Pretty ironic that one.