Top Four net spend clubs

Net Spend = Spurs fans new excuse for Failure

clearly overlooking the fact that selling ONE player each for world record fees totally skews the figures. You both had 100m to spend and spent it on dross and your struggles clearly reflect that. Don't try to take solace on that useless net-spend stat.
**

What he said - called it close the discussion down.........

comment by ☺ Wumpatröl - OK OK I admit it, he's too good for us. (U5046)
posted 12 minutes ago
I have read a few comments here and I can't help but laugh! Pool and spurs fans claiming they haven't spent badly judt because they have a low net spent is clearly overlooking the fact that selling ONE player each for world record fees totally skews the figures. You both had 100m to spend and spent it on dross and your struggles clearly reflect that. Don't try to take solace on that useless net-spend stat.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Not a single LFC fan has said that on this thread. People not being able to read should make me laugh but it doesn't. It makes me sad.

I can read

Weren't you the one proclaiming a few pages back as to how brilliant Rodgers is that has put up a title challenge with only 100m net spend? As I said, I can read

You also have autistic levels of perception and a poor application of context as it was clearly tounge in cheek!

Yeah yeah

Hilariously since spurs wasted this 100 million to win nothing, chelsea over the same period spent twice as much to win sweet feeck all.

You are clearly wound up to be throwing insults now.

I found your erroneous statement offensive.

Deflection article.

How did Spurs do today?

RtM

Finished the Europa group stage with qualification for the knockout stages, the aim whe they started the campaign. Thanks for your concern though. Chelsea have shown that it is absolutely possible to play garbage throughout a tournament and still win it when whey won the CL.