Although this is posted on both boards IT IS NOT A WUM. It's a serious question that Farwazi and Forest must answer before things can get better.
Forest have recently employed two famous characters. In no time they have been deemed to be failures and dismissed, only for them to succeed spectacularly and immediately in a different environment.
The first such character is Steve McClaren. Total failure at Forest, brilliant success at the best end of the A52. No need to say more.
The second is Tom Ince. Another failure at Forest and another brilliant success at Derby with a fantastic starts to goals ratio and some brilliant goals.
The key question is why this is so? Answer it seriously and correctly and things will turn around the The Red Dogs.
Discovering why? is important for Forest.
The Two Ends of A52
posted on 22/2/15
"Unemployment" WAS redefined by Thatcher. Even without that the first unemployment rate graph is from the ONS so I'd be interested to see where VC got his "facts" from.
----------------------------------------------------------------
'Redefined' 19 times if memory serves me right
posted on 22/2/15
Quoted, did you?
Only I didn't see the reference to it and, until I do, it's plagiarized as far as I'm concerned. I know you Commies think everything belongs to everyone, but it doesn't so don't steal.
posted on 22/2/15
To be honest 666 that response was so predictable, knew it was coming when I posted it. Struggle to argue a case so resort to spelling/grammar/English language
posted on 22/2/15
...and yet you never thought to get in your response in the 2 hours + since, despite 'knowing'?
More BS from the foil-hatted thief.
posted on 22/2/15
what Maggie has left is greed in people. Greed to not just keep up with the Jones' but be better than the Jones' She's destroyed the community spirit and people's believe in looking out for each other. No it's people looking after themselves 1st and foremost.
posted on 22/2/15
How can I respond BEFORE you say something?
posted on 22/2/15
You could have negated it. You didn't. But you 'knew'.
Liar AND a thief.
posted on 22/2/15
Yeah I could but then I wouldn't have had the pleasure of seeing your predictable response and you sidetracking because you can't win the original argument.
posted on 22/2/15
I wasn't having an original argument.
posted on 22/2/15
You joined in the original argument. Anyway I'm going out for some dinner (or lunch as you ten bob millionaires call it). Don't know where to go though, any suggestions?
Been lovely talking to you again mi likkle chubby chops, you take care now x