Evans Ban

We could all go and get t-shirts printed to defend him. There's a club who have previous for that.

When he was injured at the start of the season he was always named as one of the reasons you were poor.
-------
That's because he is one of the reasons we are poor

comment by Stretford_Ender85 (U10955)
posted 57 minutes ago
We could all go and get t-shirts printed to defend him. There's a club who have previous for that.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Why, who's had t-shirts to defend a dirty spitting lying yob, haven't seen that. The only good thing is that very few kids see Evans as a role model

Seems harsh on Evans but the FA were always going to charge him after they charged Cisse.

Shouldn't he have got less based on the fact he didn't actually spit on him?

It was pretty hard to miss him form where Evans was....

comment by SAF_The_Legend-FreePalestine(7) (U5768)
posted 51 minutes ago
Seems harsh on Evans but the FA were always going to charge him after they charged Cisse.

Shouldn't he have got less based on the fact he didn't actually spit on him?

It was pretty hard to miss him form where Evans was....
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Doesn't matter that he missed. He still spat at Ciise. Read the rules.

Then he outright denied doing it.

I was suggesting that if he was aiming for him he would have hit him, not that he shouldn't be chargeable ause he missed....

You would have to have some physical disability to miss Cisse from where Evans was!!!

That is if he wanted to hit him with the spit...

SAF

No you suggested Evans should've received a shorter ban because he didn't spit on him. Like I said, have a quick look at the rules.

Yes I did, based on the fact it was almost impossible to miss from where he was from... Or in other words he didn't try and spit at Cisse...

Either that or Evans is completely incapable of aiming his spit....

Never have I suggested that someone trying to spit at someone but missing should receive a lesser charge!

comment by SAF_The_Legend-FreePalestine(7) (U5768)
posted 10 minutes ago
Yes I did, based on the fact it was almost impossible to miss from where he was from... Or in other words he didn't try and spit at Cisse...

Either that or Evans is completely incapable of aiming his spit....

Never have I suggested that someone trying to spit at someone but missing should receive a lesser charge!
----------------------------------------------------------------------
SAF

Yeah you did. You said he should receive a lesser ban right here;

"Shouldn't he have got less based on the fact he didn't actually spit on him?"

Like I said, have a look at the rules. There's no difference in length of ban if you spat on, or at, another player.

And I'm sorry. I don't buy the 'he wasn't aiming for Ciise' excuse. If he really felt the urge to spit at that moment he could've turned his head.

SAF

Yeah you did. You said he should receive a lesser ban right here;

"Shouldn't he have got less based on the fact he didn't actually spit on him?"
_____________________________________

And then I wrote....

'It was pretty hard to miss him form where Evans was....'

So basically, as I said, I wasn't stating that players should get lesser or greater bans based on the accuracy of their spit.

Just applying common sense that if Evans had wanted to spit on somebody a couple of foot away from him he easily could have, instead he missed the large target standing right next to him and hit the floor?!

Not buying it sorry....