I know it was a bad decision but....

Do we really have to write to the SFA about it?

No one was angrier than me about what happened yesterday believe me, in the heat of the moment I found myself up off the couch shouting obscenities at the TV about where he could stick his whistle. What unfolded after that did nothing to alieviate my rage but after the match, whilst it did hurt I regained my sense of perspective.

Its not corruption, its a dreadful decision that appalled me and continues to rankle somewhat even today but it is a mistake. I don't think that writing to the SFA achieves anything at all. Do we really need to have it in big bold letters on the SFA website what is plainly obvious to any non-biased football fan?

The guy has made a complete idiot of himself in front of a national audience, is that not enough?

And what precedent would we set if action was taken as a result? They'd have to open up a new mailing department at Hampden to answer every single complaint or query from clubs wanting clarification on every single decision that went them.

I'll repeat that I was mortified at the time and wanted blood at the final whistle but I think its better to just move on and get on with winning the title.