We have many glaring issues throughout our team. But given the choice what position would you improve and organise?
Start with a position e.g. Goalkeeper, then work your way down in order of importance.
State your reason why you'd improve that position first.
Primary Position You'd Improve First
posted on 18/5/15
In that case probably no one?
posted on 18/5/15
comment by 50 (U1147)
posted 36 seconds ago
In that case probably no one?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
That is what I thought and why I don't understand why he keep trying to do it with a target man. Especially with how talented our midfield players are.
We don't need a target man.
posted on 18/5/15
We won the cup last season with Giroud as our main striker and may do again this year.
Its still the first position that I would improve as I think the improvement to the team overall by replacing one player would be there Not another bargain but=y though, w need to go for the best we can.
posted on 18/5/15
Giroud can be fantastic, like when welbeck was pushing him to prove a point. Since welbeck has been injured he has lost his quality. Is that a coincidence?
posted on 19/5/15
comment by Andre's Samba Scarf (U6253)
posted 1 hour, 57 minutes ago
Konoplyanka good shout. Only seen him once. Will tune into the europa league final though for sure. I still have extremely high hopes of Gnabry who could play there.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Looks fantastic every time I see him. I rate Gnabry highly as well, but I'm a little wary about relying on him too much next season given the the amount of time he's spent on the sidelines this year.
posted on 19/5/15
Why do you keep believe that pace upfront is all. When we had RVP upfront who has pace and supposed more ability than Giroud that lead us to a 4th place trophy at his peak. So where is the logic in that?
----------------------------------
GT somehow trying to make the point that Giroud is as good as prime RVP
posted on 19/5/15
comment by 50 (U1147)
posted 7 hours, 39 minutes ago
comment by Bring back Sanogo (U10012)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by 50 (U1147)
posted 34 seconds ago
comment by Gunnerthru (U6675)
posted 29 minutes ago
Striker is more needed now, someone with pace for starters.
Why do you keep believe that pace upfront is all. When we had RVP upfront who has pace and supposed more ability than Giroud that lead us to a 4th place trophy at his peak. So where is the logic in that?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
RvP had top class movement to make up for it, and was quicker than Giroud.
You look around all top teams, all have strikers how have good speed. Giroud is the slowest striker in Europe from the top teams I imagine.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I was wondering early one which top team in Europe has won a cup/league with a target man up front instead of a mobile striker. Not many, if any at all.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Drogba was the last one, and I think he will be the only one for some time. That was also because Chelsea played a certain way, and even he had pace.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
No, you dont understand.
Where did us lead us. What have we won with RVP when he was at this peak? You think pace upfront is all and that alone wins you title. Is Aguero pacey? Is Mandzukic pacey? Absolute pathetic debate.
posted on 19/5/15
comment by Oxlade-Chambers (Inventor) (U6157)
posted 3 hours, 30 minutes ago
Why do you keep believe that pace upfront is all. When we had RVP upfront who has pace and supposed more ability than Giroud that lead us to a 4th place trophy at his peak. So where is the logic in that?
----------------------------------
GT somehow trying to make the point that Giroud is as good as prime RVP
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I dont about that. What I know for sure is that you are a complete moron.
posted on 19/5/15
"Why do you keep believe that pace upfront is all. When we had RVP upfront who has pace and supposed more ability than Giroud that lead us to a 4th place trophy at his peak. So where is the logic in that?"
That's down to the team rather than RVP. A prime RVP would take us to a different level.
posted on 19/5/15
comment by DubbedTheNewWenger90 (U19529)
posted 1 hour, 53 minutes ago
"Why do you keep believe that pace upfront is all. When we had RVP upfront who has pace and supposed more ability than Giroud that lead us to a 4th place trophy at his peak. So where is the logic in that?"
That's down to the team rather than RVP.A prime RVP would take us to a different level.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
8 years at Arsenal to take us to another level. Peaked at 28 at Arsenal and moved. What makes you believe that he would taken us to another level?