I've been discussion with a few mates who is the better player between Sterling or Oxlade Chamberlain.
Strength of Sterling,
Dribbling, Pace, can play left right or down the middle (although his finishing is poor to play down the middle)
Strength of the Ox, Pace Power, Shooting. can play either wing and CM. (can be poor in possession)
Interesting to get your thoughts and views on who and why you think is the better player.
Sterling Or The Ox
posted on 19/6/15
Ox turned into a beast last season
Was literally so good and playing much better than overrated sterling. Ox was putting fear into his opponents. Got injured at the wrong time like all our young players who start to play well though...
posted on 20/6/15
No of course we will be up there challenging for the title. I can't see Liverpool challenging for a top 4 spot though!
posted on 20/6/15
12 points is a huge margin you fool.
posted on 20/6/15
posted on 20/6/15
Yes 12 points off the top. How many points were you off the top? You were 13 points behind 3rd place and you finished 6th for crist sake! yet you have the cheek to insult Arsenal!
posted on 20/6/15
No he's calling you a fool for suggesting that Arsenal will challenge for the title but Liverpool won't challenge for top four despite being fewer points away from that.
posted on 20/6/15
Why can't Arsenal challenge for the title? we've won the FA Cup we have a decent squad, if we have more luck with injuries no reason why we can't. Man City finished like 9 points behind Chelsea. Does that mean they also can't challenge for the title
Liverpool won't challenge for the top 4 because no Gerrard, Sterling will be off, they won't be able to attract many top players hench the doss they've signed so far.
posted on 20/6/15
This thread reminds me of the Sterling vs Januzaj threads where deluded Mancs couldn't stop telling us how much better Januzaj was and that Sterling would soon fade away.
We tried to tell them but they wouldn't listen. Look who has faded now?
posted on 20/6/15
Lmao Ox is actually a lot better than Sterling who's incredibly limited, he's like Aaron Lennon if anything people are sympathising with him carrying a poor team but Cesc stepped up as a teen, Messi stepped up as a teen, Rooney too.
These are the players idiotic Liverpool fans seem to compare Sterling with when they were at that age therefore if Raheem was good enough he'd have carried L'pool
His stats are better because he's the focal point without Sturridge and played upfront for a large period.
Lad was found out in Europe too whilst Ox took it to Milan, Bayern, Dortmund etc..
He's murdered Shaw, Alaba the list is endless. Not a single LB has had Ox in his pocket
If he was at L'pool he'd have developed a lot quicker but he's only just become a regular at Arsenal next season is a big one for him but can see him soon suddenly exploding like Bale
Better weak foot, long shot, better vision (execution needs to improve), better penetration, better at dribbling past various players in one play, more powerful
Sterling is really overrated and incredibly limited been found out this year big time, will fade away if he goes to City I reckon
posted on 20/6/15
So he's got better shooting but scores less goals, better vision but makes less assists and key passes both overall and on average and he's better at dribbling but completes less dribbles.
Brilliant.