Just watched the BBC interview OMG WHAT MATCH WAS HE WATCHING ...... I cant believe what he is saying truly shocking " weve not been active in the last two summer windows cos weve not had to". He is on another planet and for one I have had enough.
posted on 28/8/11
*RDBD. i am dislexic tonight
posted on 28/8/11
I cant believe what is going on at whl but I am so used to it these days sigh
posted on 28/8/11
Cornic u ad me booth
posted on 28/8/11
messiah i think your just irish
posted on 28/8/11
hey you racialist
posted on 28/8/11
messiah.
posted on 28/8/11
Chronic :
If you live long enough, you see how the IR behave in economic cycles. During recessions, the edict goes out to switch to "blood from stone" mode. EVERY aspect is pursued to increase the tax take. When things are good, they forget about them.
That aside, the IR prowess in big tax cases is a trusty shambles. They seem to lose loads (VAT claims/rebates against multi-nationals etc) , with no notable successes.
Equally trusty is their rabid attacks on small fry, with the bullying nasty premise that their victims won't have good representation. I love it when they get burnt on these ones.
posted on 28/8/11
RDBD. you seem older and wiser so i will listen
posted on 28/8/11
Chronic :
What is "wiser" is often about already seeing/done things (right or wrong) that you have yet to experience (always learn from your mistakes - better to learn from those of others) .
As a working adult I have experienced 3 recessions.
The first (1990 onwards) I got hit by the IR. Did wrong, but they were in "blood" mode. Actually continued doing it until the legislation changed (too late IR - your 7 seven yrs review period has LONG GONE !!! ) , but because the economy has picked up again, I slipped under the radar.
This one, same tactics again. That is how it goes.
Much of big tax law seems to go where the IR have a lot to lose (VAT repayments to big business etc) , or they want to set a case law precedent where statute law does not exist (IR35, "income splitting" etc) .
Much of the latter affects small fry, and they really try "sledgehammer to crack a nut" tactics.
posted on 28/8/11
Small fry are easier and cheaper....... value for money. The reason the government cut a deal with Vodaphone is because they can afford good lawyers so any money the Government got out of them would have been diluted by the costs.
The papers don't like reporting good news. Take the deal with the Swiss banks. The UK is likely to get an extra £1.5billion in tax this year from them but all the papers focus on is the fact that the details of who has Swiss bank accounts will remain anonymous. You just have to balance up morals with cold hard cash at times like this.