My sources are telling me that's what the agreed transfer fee is. This will either, in time, prove to be a great move by City or an unmitigated disaster of a signing. No doubt he has potential but 49 million is incredibly steep. Where would you like to see the money reinvested?? Perhaps hijacking the Casillas transfer? Benteke?? I think Pedro would be a bold move if Liverpool were to win his signature. Great little player.
posted on 12/7/15
comment by Mr Mourinho (U5874)
posted 1 minute ago
£49 million for that piece of crap
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Good player poor attitude
posted on 12/7/15
City have got a highly versatile quality player.
posted on 12/7/15
City are mugs.
posted on 12/7/15
I hope he turns to be in a SWPesque player.
posted on 12/7/15
comment by LocoLiverpool (U18018)
posted 20 minutes ago
Your sources are a bit late.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Macca I guess
posted on 12/7/15
Finishing aside, he's a very good player.
However, the fee is ridiculously high.
I don't wish him well. He treated the club and the fans with contempt.
The important thing now is to bring the right players. We've made a good start in this regard already imo. However a striker now is paramount.
posted on 12/7/15
Imagine the reception when he goes back to Anfield he will get slaughtered.
posted on 12/7/15
Alright Smithy lad! I'm sure you are as pleased with £49m as is Liverpool fans
posted on 12/7/15
Your sources?
What Talksport, Sky sport and BBC Sport?
Good one mate.
M
posted on 12/7/15
Shameless
Imagine the reception when he goes back to anfield and destroys Liverpool on the park then walks off with a wee smirk on his face