or to join or start a new Discussion

13 Comments
Article Rating     Not Rated Yet

How Man City bought 4 Intl's for £8.7m

Manchester City have topped the summer spenders in the transfer market but will still dodge financial fair play.

Manchester City have pulled off a cash conjuring trick to bring in four top players … at an increased cost of just £8.7m!

That is the finding of a study of the Blues finances by respected football finance blogger The Swiss Ramble, who has delved into the figures surrounding the club’s £142million transfer splurge.

Many have questioned how City can “get away" with such a big spend, just a season after they were punished by Uefa for breaching financial fair play limits.

But the Swiss Ramble blog, written by qualified accountant Kieron O’Connor, has come up with the simple answer.

And when the maths are done, City have added Kevin de Bruyne, Raheem Sterling, Nicolas Otamendi, Fabian Delph, Patrick Roberts and Enes Unal to their ranks for small change!

City made £347million in 2013-14, second only to United in the Premier League. And with a the bumper new TV deal about to kick in, City’s commercial department working on lucrative new sponsorships – including a possible revision of the blockbuster shirt and stadium deals – and with stadium capacity increased, that trend is continuing.

In fact, given the strength of the pound against the euro, City should overtake Paris St Germain and be challenging Barcelona and Bayern Munich for third and fourth places on the world money list.

But the process of amortising the cost of players over the length of their contract, has drastically reduced the figure that appears on the books. For instance, de Bruyne’s £54m cost will be spread over the six years of his contract, so on this year’s accounts he will have cost just £9m.

When you tot up the amortised cost of all their signings, it will appear on the books as £26.5m.

Player sales appear on the books in full, so City raised £35.4m from the departures of Alvaro Negredo, Matija Nastasic, Scott Sinclair, Dedryck Boyata, Karim Rekik, Rony Lopes, plus loan fees for Edin Dzeko, Stevan Jovetic and Jason Denayer.

And, while the new boys added £31.7m to the wage bill, the departures of high earners James Milner, Frank Lampard and Micah Richards means the wage bill is REDUCED by £10m.

That wage bill had already been significantly reduced by the re-negotiation of the top salaries to give a lower basic wage but higher performance bonuses.

The 2013-14 accounts also included compensation payments to Roberto Mancini and his coaching staff.

So City have improved the squad for £8.7million, while boosting revenue and slashing the wage bill – magic man Dynamo could not have done it any better!

comment by Jay. (U16498)

posted on 10/9/15

It's only the same as every other club does.

2 things though - if you're going to amortise signings, it's fine, but you either include the other signings from previous years that you're still paying, to give a more accurate view of what you're paying per season.

Or, you acknowledge that despite it being cheaper this season - you're still paying £25m+ a season, for 5 seasons, for those players, regardless of the sales of other players that mitigate one of the payments down to £9m, for one season.

You can't escape the fact that the players have cost x amount, not matter how the figures are twisted around.

posted on 10/9/15

"How Man City bought 4 Intl's for £8.7m"

A cheap team for cheap fans

posted on 10/9/15

comment by Jay. (U16498)
posted 23 minutes ago
What about the players whose fees you amortised in the last 5 years? Surely they're still being paid for an appear on the accounts...?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
That

comment by Ruiney (U1005)

posted on 10/9/15

And, while the new boys added £31.7m to the wage bill,
...

£600k a week, blimey

comment by Jay. (U16498)

posted on 10/9/15

comment by Ruiney (U1005)
posted 1 minute ago
And, while the new boys added £31.7m to the wage bill,
...

£600k a week, blimey
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Which actually means (taking away Lampard, etc) the bill increased by £21m

comment by Blarmy (U14547)

posted on 17/9/15

^ Jay's comment killed the site for a week

comment by Busby (U19985)

posted on 17/9/15

What I don't understand is how you hide the full transfer value if a player leaves the club.

E.g Sterling is valued at £9m a season for 5 years, what happens to the £9m for the final two years if he is sold after three?

It disappears off the books?

posted on 17/9/15

Bats,

The transfer fee recouped pays that off and then anything extra is a profit.

So, if sterling is 9m for five years, then after three years he has a book value of 18m. If he is sold for less that that, then it would be a loss. If not, then it is a profit.

comment by Busby (U19985)

posted on 17/9/15

"Player sales appear on the books in full, so City raised £35.4m from the departures of Alvaro Negredo, Matija Nastasic, Scott Sinclair, Dedryck Boyata, Karim Rekik, Rony Lopes, plus loan fees for Edin Dzeko, Stevan Jovetic and Jason Denayer."

Surely some of these players didn't sell for a full profit though?

posted on 17/9/15

I'm not sure where they got that figure from as it's not from the original swiss ramble figures.

We actually made around 50.5 million from player sales, with another 5 and a bit from the loans as well.

The profit on the sales was 40.2 million, and that is without a fee for Dzeko or Jovetic which will be next summer.

Sign in if you want to comment
RATE THIS ARTICLE
Rate Breakdown
5
0 Votes
4
0 Votes
3
0 Votes
2
0 Votes
1
0 Votes

Average Rating: 0 from 0 votes

ARTICLE STATS
Day
Article RankingNot Ranked
Article ViewsNot Available
Average Time(mins)Not Available
Total Time(mins)Not Available
Month
Article RankingNot Ranked
Article ViewsNot Available
Average Time(mins)Not Available
Total Time(mins)Not Available