That was the hors d'oeu-vre

For Giroud's two headers I raise you headers from Dier and Aldweirald. Spurs had more chances as simple as that.

comment by Hod idol the x factor - Mo's posh tin set! (U5117)

For Giroud's two headers I raise you headers from Dier and Aldweirald. Spurs had more chances as simple as that.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

It was 10-8 to Arsenal in chances

(per Squawka)

comment by #LiquidGenius (U20571)
posted 38 minutes ago
Arsenal definitely should have won that game in the end.

Giroud had three good headed-opportunities, the second of which was an absolute sitter.

Spurs played with good intensity in the first half, but fatigued in the second and Özil started ripping them apart.

Özil could have had 4 assists today. Still broke a PL record though.

Big chance missed for Arsenal to go two points clear at the top.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I fell asleep half way through reading this, now I'm awake I'll have another beer.
I'm getting used to spurs bossing games

comment by Bats (U18355)
posted 55 minutes ago
comment by Dont cry for me Argentina we have Pochetinno and Lamela (formely avb easy as 123) (U17539)
posted 3 minutes ago
Caster Troy

Yes Arsenal were missing attacking players but you forget we were also missing Chadli, N'Jie and Townsend.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
How unfortunate
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For Arsenal.

Beat West Ham and Spurs will press on nicely.

comment by #LiquidGenius (U20571)
posted 1 hour, 7 minutes ago
On possession and bossing the game, Spurs should have definitely won it though, and well before Giroud got his chances.
------------------------------------------------------------

You were dominating the midfield physically but weren't creating many chances.

The game was always more even than Gary Neville was making it seem.

Toby A's header was the only clear cut chance you had aside from Kane's goal, and that happened after Giroud had his first 2 chances.

Game of two halves really.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
10 shots to 14 in our favour

Both with 4 shots on target each

That shows we had more attacking intent than you but with out the killer shots to make it count.

We dominated the game from back to front and should have won easily

comment by ツ VertongHєиgу (U9129)

comment by #LiquidGenius (U20571)

On possession and bossing the game, Spurs should have definitely won it though, and well before Giroud got his chances.
------------------------------------------------------------

You were dominating the midfield physically but weren't creating many chances.

The game was always more even than Gary Neville was making it seem.

Toby A's header was the only clear cut chance you had aside from Kane's goal, and that happened after Giroud had his first 2 chances.

Game of two halves really.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
10 shots to 14 in our favour

Both with 4 shots on target each

That shows we had more attacking intent than you but with out the killer shots to make it count.

We dominated the game from back to front and should have won easily
----------------------------------------------------------------------

You dominated from back-to-front, yet had less chances (10-8) and were reliant on Giroud failing to convert 3 clear chances... just to get a draw?

In the 2nd half, almost everytime Ozil got the ball on the right, he destroyed your defence with his crosses.

On chances created yes, it was more even. But on general game play and momentum, you were beaten all over the park.

Never seen such a dominant performance from Spurs over Arsenal.

comment by #LiquidGenius (U20571)
posted 39 minutes ago
comment by ツ VertongHєиgу (U9129)

comment by #LiquidGenius (U20571)

On possession and bossing the game, Spurs should have definitely won it though, and well before Giroud got his chances.
------------------------------------------------------------

You were dominating the midfield physically but weren't creating many chances.

The game was always more even than Gary Neville was making it seem.

Toby A's header was the only clear cut chance you had aside from Kane's goal, and that happened after Giroud had his first 2 chances.

Game of two halves really.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
10 shots to 14 in our favour

Both with 4 shots on target each

That shows we had more attacking intent than you but with out the killer shots to make it count.

We dominated the game from back to front and should have won easily
----------------------------------------------------------------------

You dominated from back-to-front, yet had less chances (10-8) and were reliant on Giroud failing to convert 3 clear chances... just to get a draw?

In the 2nd half, almost everytime Ozil got the ball on the right, he destroyed your defence with his crosses.

----------------------------------------------------------------------
We was the away team

You lot was was outplayed and lucky to get a draw but yes keep deluding yourself

Sandy, sherif talking s** as usual on the "NL review" article. Saying we "bottled" it. God this clown talks so much deluded c**