It is disappointing that a debate has re-emerged around the subject of Rangers’ history in Scottish football. It must be especially frustrating for the Club’s supporters who again find individuals within the structures of Scottish football unfairly targeting the Club.
As the one individual who was a major shareholder and director throughout the period that gave rise to the HMRC dispute, and again find myself in a similar capacity, I believe that I am uniquely positioned to make three important observations.
First, irrespective of the final outcome of the tax appeal (which might take several more years) the football team had no advantage from any tax savings from the scheme put in place by the Murray Group. Throughout the period in question the shareholders were committed to providing funding to the Club. The tax scheme may have reduced the need for shareholders to provide higher levels of funding so, as I have tried to make clear in the past, any advantage gained would have been to the company and its shareholders, not the team. Certain players may not have signed for the Club without the perceived benefit of personal tax savings but there was no general advantage for the player squad, or the performance on the pitch. We would still have signed players of equal abilities if one or two had decided they didn’t want to sign under different financial circumstances.
Secondly, Lord Nimmo Smith has fully and finally dealt with the legitimacy of the continuity of the Club’s history. There is no more to be debated on that issue.
Finally, it is extraordinary that representatives of other Scottish clubs – who admit the damage done to Scottish football by Rangers’ removal from the Premier League – should even wish to re-engage with this issue. It is time those individuals, who represent other clubs, recognise their legal and fiduciary responsibilities to their own clubs and shareholders rather than submit to the uninformed ramblings of a few outspoken fans to whom attacking Rangers is more important than the wellbeing of their own clubs.
This is a misguided attempt (that will ultimately fail) to rewrite history and defeat Rangers off the park when their teams could not do so on the park at the time. The history of many other clubs would have to be rewritten if this illogical argument was to be consistently applied.
Having reviewed documentation that has become available to me I believe that Rangers was harshly and, in some instances, unfairly treated in the period leading up to demotion from the Premier League. However, that is now history and I have publicly stated, with the full support of the recently installed board, that we wish to put the past behind us and move on in partnership with all clubs throughout Scotland to improve and restore the image and quality of Scottish football as a whole. This will be to the benefit of all clubs.
For the avoidance of doubt, however, I wish to make one point clear. If the history of our Club comes under attack we will deal with it in the strongest manner possible and will hold to account those persons who have acted against their fiduciary responsibilities to their own clubs and to Scottish football
http://rangers.co.uk/news/headlines/dave-king-statement-5/
Dave King Statement
posted on 12/11/15
Comment Deleted by Site Moderator
posted on 12/11/15
Comment Deleted by Site Moderator
posted on 12/11/15
comment by Hector (U3606)
posted 27 minutes ago
As critical of timmy as I have been, he deserves kudos for this his biggest bite.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Timmy isn't on it
posted on 12/11/15
Comment Deleted by Site Moderator
posted on 12/11/15
Comment Deleted by Site Moderator
posted on 12/11/15
The statement is very good
This is put together by the legal reps not King
He signs it
As for other clubs well it is possible even probable that some are in contact with the sfa
I'm pretty sure the legal team know who is saying what
No need for a statement as they were on a conference call and some took the stated angle allegedly
posted on 12/11/15
Comment Deleted by Site Moderator
posted on 12/11/15
Possibly I don't remember everything King has said
He says to much at times
This is the situation and stance as of now though
It could change again right enough
posted on 12/11/15
Comment Deleted by Site Moderator
posted on 13/11/15
Comment Deleted by Site Moderator