or to join or start a new Discussion

64 Comments
Article Rating     Not Rated Yet

Lukaku

Lukaku became only 5th player to score 50 Premier League goals before turning 23 last week. Other 4 who achieved this land mark before 23 are Fowler, Owen, Rooney and Ronaldo.

He is in good company, isn't he?

It's great to see him finally starting to realize his immense potential. IMO He is going to own the league for years to come.

IMO Lukaku should be one of our main targets for the next summer.

Chelsea

posted on 24/11/15

We are talking about kane here not Drogba. Kane's hold up play is still not that great when compared to great strikers.

Sure, lukaku can be as good at holding up the ball as Kane is currently, probably will improve more. He has improved quite a lot this season in that area. He is still 22, he will get much better. Strikers generally peak at 24/25.

comment by Busby (U19985)

posted on 24/11/15

Guess time will tell

comment by Busby (U19985)

posted on 24/11/15

Lukaku scored 50 in 4.5 seasons, Kane may well do it in 2.5 (.5 because Lukaku only played 10 games one season, as did Kane).

It's worth remembering Lukaku scored about 10 goals last season. Needs to be consistent before being touted as one of the best.

posted on 24/11/15

I don't think either of them are among the best at the mo. Kane was playing in championship before last season.

Currently kane is slightly better imo, but lukaku has a higher ceiling.

Lukaku vs kane debate deserves a thread of its own,

Robb???

posted on 24/11/15

No way we'll touch him for that amount of money.

------------------------------------------------------

Really? We're prepared to spend over £50 million on an unproven Martial.

I'm pretty sure in this market we'd spend £45 million on Lukaku if we wanted him.

posted on 24/11/15

I'm pretty sure in this market we'd spend £45 million on Lukaku if we wanted him.

................

Going by the fact that we didn't in the summer is a pretty good guideline that LVG didn't want him.

posted on 24/11/15

comment by Vidicschin (U3584)
posted 17 seconds ago
I'm pretty sure in this market we'd spend £45 million on Lukaku if we wanted him.

................

Going by the fact that we didn't in the summer is a pretty good guideline that LVG didn't want him.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

He didn't really want any strikers though did he? He got rid of a couple of our strikers to rely on a washed up Rooney and an unproven 19 year old.

This summer you'd think our need would be stronger for a new striker.

posted on 24/11/15

He didn't really want any strikers though did he?

..........

Yes he did. He bought one.

posted on 24/11/15

I'm not sure either Lukaku or Kane are entirely necessary but if I had to choose one, I'd pick Kane because I think he has a little more flexibility to his game and being English slightly tips things in his favour too for me.

Surely though Martial will start playing up front for us consistently once we strengthen the wide areas because playing out wide all the time is I think a waste of his talents as good as he is out wide.

The ideal player we want is somebody like Thomas Muller who can play wide but centrally too if need be.

posted on 24/11/15

Muller is going to be this summers big signing. It's assured.

Sign in if you want to comment
RATE THIS ARTICLE
Rate Breakdown
5
0 Votes
4
0 Votes
3
0 Votes
2
0 Votes
1
0 Votes

Average Rating: 0 from 0 votes

ARTICLE STATS
Day
Article RankingNot Ranked
Article ViewsNot Available
Average Time(mins)Not Available
Total Time(mins)Not Available
Month
Article RankingNot Ranked
Article ViewsNot Available
Average Time(mins)Not Available
Total Time(mins)Not Available