Looking likely to be one of the worse loan moves ever for us. Can't believe we have loaned one of our most talented youngsters to such a poor team with a dinosaur manager in pulis. They don't play the style suited to Pritchards ability and the plank Pulis will barely play him. I was disappointed when Pritchard was loaned but was willing to give it a chance if it meant him getting games. We might aswell of kept him at spurs and played him in the europa. Pointless loan to a terrible team with the most negative manager in premier league history.
posted on 21/2/16
I like him as a poster but personally don't believe he's An insider. Got far to many things wrong to be connected with the club
posted on 21/2/16
Fantasist imo
posted on 21/2/16
I somehow came across this the other day...
comment by look like modric (U7431)
posted on 15/4/15
i think poch will be gone by october got nothing about him to suggest to me he will all of a sudden become a good head coach. he is relatively experienced i dont think he deserves as much slack as he gets from everyone.
i have been warning about finishing the season poorly since january down to fitness. the stats show it, pochs history shows it, our body language shows it yet we have nothing to combat it.
my fav myth that he trusts youngsters well lets see if he plays them in sub apperances towards the tail end of the season i bet he does not. winks, onomah, walker-peters needs games. (walker-peters should be our right back due to the injuries we had)
posted on 21/2/16
wow LLM you do talk a load of s*** bro. Poch gone by October. Walker-peters our right back. Not sure I can take what you say seriously anymore sorry
posted on 21/2/16
I just like the comments "he'll be gone by October" "nothing to suggest he'll become a good coach" and that it's a myth he trusts his younger players he couldn't have been more wrong! No disrespect to LLM but I did find that post funny
posted on 21/2/16
Agree Don. Why didn't we just keep him here and he could have featured in this build up of games we have? Since we did not bring in another forward was it wise to let go of Townsend and Pritchard when Clinton is out longterm?
posted on 21/2/16
comment by Don_tottenham (U3372)
posted 1 day ago
Like someone said why didn't we offer him to palace? They are in need of attacking players and with bolasie injured, Pritchard could of been perfect. Palace might not be on form but are a much better footballing side than brom, disappointed we can't take him
Back this season
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Palace turned out to be a better footballing side than Spurs today, so maybe Palace didn't need Pritchard.
posted on 21/2/16
comment by aries22 (U1203)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by Don_tottenham (U3372)
posted 1 day ago
Like someone said why didn't we offer him to palace? They are in need of attacking players and with bolasie injured, Pritchard could of been perfect. Palace might not be on form but are a much better footballing side than brom, disappointed we can't take him
Back this season
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Palace turned out to be a better footballing side than Spurs today, so maybe Palace didn't need Pritchard.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
no not really. they took their chances better though, granted good luck to them in next round !
posted on 22/2/16
Aires, Just because palace win, it dosen't mean they were the better footballing side. Spurs were still dominant with a mixed team out and should of really win. Ah well, still got that small thing called the title to play for and still in Europe....... Westbrom on the other hand
posted on 22/2/16
Won *