Well he has gotten off lightly then, 30 days, how does this work ? Is the drug he took less of a stimulant than others ? was it less of a supplement ?
Oh well it's done now so perhaps we can move on.
http://www.bbc.com/sport/football/36161272
Sakho banned for 30 days
posted on 28/4/16
Is that because he'd had one of Kolo's wife's special supplements?
You just can't defend this its too stupid for words. Shame but lets see. If he makes decisions like that off the pitch you can't trust him on it!
posted on 28/4/16
It wasn't a defence, it was simply a factoid
posted on 28/4/16
wasn't a stimilant...it was a fat buster/reducer or something...
unsure if it is illegal why he hasn't got more ban though...
i mean is it legal or not...
posted on 28/4/16
All drug taking should carry a mandatory life ban.
posted on 28/4/16
please don't ban me
posted on 28/4/16
comment by sandy, senior citizen, but young at heart (U20567)
posted 2 minutes ago
All drug taking should carry a mandatory life ban.
--------
If it wasn't for drugs you'd be dead already you old git
posted on 28/4/16
comment by Redinthehead - FreeGaza - فلسطين (U1860)
posted 1 hour, 51 minutes ago
comment by sandy, senior citizen, but young at heart (U20567)
posted 2 minutes ago
All drug taking should carry a mandatory life ban.
--------
If it wasn't for drugs you'd be dead already you old git
----------------------------------------------------------------------
posted on 28/4/16
comment by JimmyTheRed (U1682)
posted 5 hours, 32 minutes ago
I hope it runs similar to a drink/drive disqualification, in that if someone pleads or is found guilty of drink drive and the court needs to adjourn, they have the power to provisionally disqualify, same as EUFA imposing provisional suspension, so that, when the final decision is made, say 9-12 months suspension, day one is today.
The sooner suspension is started, the sooner ended.
JimmyTheRed
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You mean an "interim ban"
He is currently banned for 30 days pending a full hearing.
9 months is the most likely outcome.
M
posted on 28/4/16
comment by Sheriff JW Pepper (U1007)
posted 3 hours, 59 minutes ago
wasn't a stimilant...it was a fat buster/reducer or something...
unsure if it is illegal why he hasn't got more ban though...
i mean is it legal or not...
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Fat burners are classed as stimulants.
M
posted on 30/4/16
Fat burners is cutting corners on hard work
Not only should he not be carrying any excess fat in the first place but if he is he should be working double hard to shift it
We do not pay him an extraordinary amount of money to not take his conditioning seriously enough. That is the attitude that needs to leave our club!