or to join or start a new Discussion

56 Comments
Article Rating 2.63 Stars

Pogba at 89 million or Stones at 48 million

Which is the better value?

This is not meant as a wum, a genuine question to the fans (including City fans) that were in complete hysterics over Pogba's fee.

1 star = Pogba
5 stars = Stones
3 stars = equal
2 or 4 stars means your mum's a filthy bukkake loving ho

posted on 9/8/16

Baines is only £5.5 now after his price dropped from £7.5 at one point as he missed a lot of the season due t injuries.

Good price that as he will be a certain starter and I would expect them to at least be a little more solid under Koeman.

posted on 9/8/16


Stones for me will be a mistake, can't see him getting rid of those errors in his game. You always feel like when he has the ball You can't quite relax... Evansitis I'd call it.

--

Tbf, i think Smalling a couple of years ago was like that, under LVG he has really established himself as a top drawer defender, always think its unfair on CBs being judged in their early 20s.

comment by Vishnu (U18090)

posted on 9/8/16

So £47.5m buys you the 59th ranked tackling defender last season. No wonder Pogba cost so much.

comment by Vishnu (U18090)

posted on 9/8/16

They laugh at our signings but they've spent over 150 million on stones, sterling, otamendi and mangala.

Absolutely terrible value for money there.

posted on 9/8/16

Kante for only £30 million is better value than both put together
_________________

Based on one season?



"utd fans are bigging him up to be the best thing ever!"
__________________

Can you provide evidence/examples of this? I'm guessing not...

posted on 9/8/16

comment by Vishnu (U18090)
posted 16 minutes ago
They laugh at our signings but they've spent over 150 million on stones, sterling, otamendi and mangala.

Absolutely terrible value for money there.

----------------------------------------------------------------------
To be fair I've not seen City fans laughing at the fee, more clubs like Spurs and Liverpool.

Both of whome cannot afford to do that, and if they could I'm sure they would eventually blow the bank for a top player.

Spurs seem the most on edge recently, maybe that they only actually finished 4 points ahead of ourselves and City, and haven't improved much at all while we are both filling the gaps in our team whatever the costs.

Getting in their "enjoy Thursday's" jibes while they can for a year.

posted on 9/8/16

comment by Vishnu (U18090)
posted 17 minutes ago
They laugh at our signings but they've spent over 150 million on stones, sterling, otamendi and mangala.

Absolutely terrible value for money there.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Firstly, it is way too premature to say any of the first three are terrible value for money, particularly given the age of the first two.

Secondly, I'm not sure any City fan has laughed at the value of Pogba

posted on 9/8/16

Are these genuine prices

Football

posted on 9/8/16

Stones going for almost 50m makes 100m Pogba look like a bargain.
At least Pogba is a world class talent and has played at the highest level.

posted on 9/8/16

Stones going for almost 50m makes 100m Pogba look like a bargain.
At least Pogba is a world class talent and has played at the highest level

--

Don't think pogba is world class yet. Stones definately isn't.

Sign in if you want to comment
RATE THIS ARTICLE
Rate Breakdown
5
0 Votes
4
0 Votes
3
0 Votes
2
0 Votes
1
0 Votes

Average Rating: 2.63 from 19 votes

ARTICLE STATS
Day
Article RankingNot Ranked
Article ViewsNot Available
Average Time(mins)Not Available
Total Time(mins)Not Available
Month
Article RankingNot Ranked
Article ViewsNot Available
Average Time(mins)Not Available
Total Time(mins)Not Available