Just wondering why is it that when we played like shiiit last season it was Mourinho's fault and not the players, but when we play shiiit this season its the players' fault and not Conte, It don't make sense, does it?
I don't think it was ever Mourinho's fault back then and it ain't Conte's fault now. Mourinho has been 100% vindicated imo, but its furrrking hilarious that some dudes just won't admit it because they're just plain jealous of everything Mourinho has achieved.
So yeah, what do you think?
Double Standards
posted on 26/9/16
I guess if Jose goes on to do well at united and Conte struggles at Chelsea you will have concrete evidence to back up your suggestion Wahl.
posted on 26/9/16
Knee dude, and I am sure those two things will happen
posted on 26/9/16
Wahl where do you see both Chelsea and United finishing this season?
posted on 26/9/16
Jose had to go Whaldude, he was unbearable towards the end of his stint at Chelsea, attracting negative press and was damaging the club image with his weekly rants.
posted on 26/9/16
Bro Wonder, Man Utd 1st, Chelsea 6th.
posted on 26/9/16
Shouldn't you be embarrassed with your pathetic team mounting title challange this decade ?
posted on 26/9/16
Just to clear uo the confusion, Ignore my last post Whaldude, wrong intended destination
posted on 26/9/16
Wahl do you have beef with b*tch boy again after he won you over at the end of last season?
posted on 26/9/16
Yeah, I do Broctavian. I thought he was gonna try harder for the team, but I can see now he ain't ever gonna change.
posted on 26/9/16
comment by Wahl Icht. (U21057)
posted 3 hours, 25 minutes ago
Matadude, Mourinho wanted to add to the squad in 2015 Summer, but he wasn't able to get the players he wanted. He wanted Stones but ended up with Djilobodji. He wanted Pogba but didn't get ANY midfielder. I think he knew what was going to happen (Although I don't think he expected to be as bad as it was) but wasn't given what he needed to stop it.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I don't buy that for 1 minute. FFS Chelsea have at least 26 players out on loan and if Maureen wanted replacements he should have used some of those.
I mean, what is the point of keeping players if they're not going to perform or just aren't good enough when he could have used some of the loanees and ditched the bad element.
Think about this for a minute. Maybe if he's have ditched some of the trouble makers and used loanees instead, would Chelsea have finished down in 10th?
Maybe, maybe not, but, Jose might have kept his job, Chelsea might have some good young players in the squad and the bad element would be gone.
That's why Maureen is such a knоb, he could have turned it around but HE chose not to, therefore it is all Maureen's fault and nobody else's.