Domestic and international football are two distinct domains of football, but I notice an interesting parallel between the two - both of them were once contested by many very talented teams, yet now, in my opinion, are dominated by just three. At club level, Europe has three teams who I think are currently the best by some way - Real Madrid, Manchester United and Barcelona. Internationally, the top three are Holland, Germany and Spain.
Looking even closer, these three teams seem to correspond with each other in playing style. Real Madrid and Holland both play physical football with an emphasis on defensive discipline, while still being able to attack with flair. Manchester United and Germany play attacking football at a high, urgent tempo and neither are afraid to invest in youth. The sentence "Never write off _" can be completed with either of these teams. The similarities between Barcelona and Spain are obvious; sharing many of the same players, they play possession football, keeping the ball for long periods and pressing the opponents hard when they don't have it.
Looking beyond these things, I begin to feel pessimistic about modern football. International football has been dying on its feet for years (for many reasons) and the quality of football has been declining, at least since 2002 in my opinion (albeit it revived briefly during the world cup of 2006). England aren't ranked 4th because they're particularly good; it's because the rest of the teams aren't particularly great either. France, though talented, haven't looked good in years, and Italy, a side I've always liked, have not aged gracefully, and I find it difficult to see them resurrecting themselves for quite some time. It's not necessarily a question of talent; nobody disputes that Portugal and Argentina have talented players, but the way they play does little to optimise their abilities. The fact that Brazil are no longer a fearsome team is something I find a little saddening - they used to be so great to watch.
Similarly, in the Champions' League, it's very difficult to see any side outside the three mentioned winning it (Inter Milan and Real Madrid basically swapped places when Mourinho went between them). There used to be a time when quite a few very well-organised sides could win it (in 1998/99, there were three potential winners in Utd's group alone), but with the fall of Serie A (AC and Inter Milan have won the Champions' League in recent years, but both fell apart the following year), the perennial lightweightedness of the French Ligue 1 and the inconsistency of German teams (Bayern and Schalke are perfect examples of this) means that getting to the semi-finals is no longer a large achievement (this isn't to say that semi-finalists generally aren't good teams, however).
On one hand, it's great to see Utd consistently do well in Europe, but looking at the bigger picture, it's lamentable that people now expect Utd to comfortably beat the likes of AC Milan and Juventus - even Utd's last two semi-final opponents put up token resistance! What it's led to is a less competitive Europe, with few teams having the quality to win it and fans pedestalising those who do. It's no wonder people are so obsessed with Barcelona - very few teams have good defences, and this year, those that did either got their tactics horribly wrong (United) or were on the receiving end of a Busquets Special (Real Madrid).
It may seem odd that I (a Utd fan) want better competition in Europe. Think of it this way; as far as international football is concerned, I'm a neutral (Ireland haven't been at a tournament in almost a decade). When I watch World Cups and European Championships, I want to see great teams. It makes the event much more epic, raises the excitement and makes you feel like you've really witnessed something great. Similarly, playing the AC Milan team of 2007 in the semi-final is much more thrilling than playing Schalke 04 - yes, we lost that one, but it makes it much more meaningful when you do win. It's the reason that even though Inter Milan and Barcelona have won trebles, Utd's one in 1999 is the one everybody knows - because it was done at a time when Utd's opponents for the Champions' League and Premiership titles were of a very high standard. Had Utd beaten City and Barcelona (let's say Hargreaves never got injured and remained his 2008 self), people would remember Utd winning a mediocre Premier League and a Europe with only a few good teams.
Some Thoughts
posted on 7/9/11
i ent reading that
posted on 7/9/11
Captain Right,
Yet you've gone all the way to the end of the page just so you can type up a comment to tell us that. It's a little self-defeating if you ask me.
If it's seriously beyond your attention span to read a full article, then click on the "back" button in the top left corner of your screen. Don't bother wasting your time commenting on an article you haven't even read.
posted on 7/9/11
"Some Thoughts"
You liar.
posted on 7/9/11
Indeed, my old Russian Linear Algebra teacher used to begin some of his lectures by saying, "Uh, I'd like to begin this lecture with a brief note on linear operators" which would then go on for ten or fifteen minutes. I see I've picked up his habit!
posted on 7/9/11
Spot on, not sure I agree with you likening the European clubs to international teams though, but I agree that the CL was really boring last year, the likes of Schalke getting to the semis says it all really.
posted on 7/9/11
Fantastic article sir. I cannot explain the reasons for the lack of competition at international level.
But I believe the reason it is so uncompetitive at club level is due to the lack of numbers in terms of quality. In the 90's for example, a lot of top sides had what you could describe as world class players. They were spread out fairly evenly across Europe - Zidane, Bergkamp, Ronaldo, Raul, Rivaldo, Scholes, Batistuta etc playing at different clubs. In addition, these top clubs often had more than one special player.
Nowadays, as there is a lack of special players, the truly quality players want to play for clubs that can compete, therefore, you often have them all ending up at the same clubs - Barca and Madrid having the pick of Europe.
posted on 7/9/11
Brilliant article!
I have to agree with you that the standard of football is falling. I honestly believe that its to do with the spending power of the big clubs that no one else can match. Its been happening in the prem league ever since sky turned up and now its being transferred onto the cl as well. In the late 90's and ealry 00's the competition was a lot tougher because a lot of teams had relatively equal spending power. Now it seems real, barca and utd (city and chelsea recently as well) are hogging all the top players. Both the serie a and bundesliga have fallen away greatly. If each of these leagues all provided 2/3 serious competitors there'd be around 12 top teams battling it out. Add maybe porto and others and you'd have a very strong competition, but sadly thats not the case.
Im not sure if the trend will continue but i sure hope not!
posted on 7/9/11
Cult of Personality,
The parallels are approximate, they're general similarities. I was just surprised that I didn't notice this sooner!
I'd really love for the Italian and German teams to become big players in Europe again, but somehow, Ican't see that happening.
Darren the King Fletcher - Balotelli's a Comedy Genius,
The 90s was some decade for football - Juventus were quite some team back then, as were AC Milan. Although Milan are still a Champions' League club, Juventus' demise has been shocking.
There was none of this love-in with the Spanish big two, every country back then had clubs that would run Utd close - and that was with Giggs Keane Scholes Beckham playing, arguably United's greatest ever midfield!
The Next Special One,
The money has definitely gone out of control. Some people say that it's great to see City provide some competition to the top 4. What about the teams that can't compete because City are buying all the players that will get a club into the Champions' League? All it's done is expanded the top clubs by one.
posted on 7/9/11
There also seems to be a lack of decent management. Add to the fact that any manager that may have potential to do good things, is never given the time.
Didn't Fergie say that all the managers with the potential to replace him are unemployed?
posted on 8/9/11
Probably, I have half a recollection of him saying something like that.
Carlo Ancelotti would have done a pretty good job this year if the Roman Emperor hadn't sacked him. Villas-Boas will still do well, but he'll get the same treatment as Ancelotti if Chelsea have don't continue to replace the older members of their aging squad.