Satan's back baby

Should not sell to anyone in the league.

Sell him to Bayern if they are said to be interested, even if it's a lot lower than what City would pay.

Why would we strengthen a direct rival in Man City ?

Not going to happen.

We should not strengthen rivals. Those days have gone

If it's about money then we should offer to improve his contract. If it's about winning silverware, I'm not sure why he'd want to join City who haven't won any major silverware for 3 years and look no closer to it.

Selling to a rival, a player we'd rather hold on to, just sends out the wrong message and makes our players look more poachable to fellow PL clubs.

Let's not forget, it's not like it would sting City if it were a huge offer. Money is nothing to them, they can spend what they like, but it would undoubtedly strengthen their team.

We should just say no. Got 4 years left on his contract and it's World Cup tournament after next season.

So he either sulks and annoys poch and misses World Cup or gets over performs and goes to World Cup.

Even if we do strengthen a rival (Man City) they need to do more than just Walker, he's not the last piece of that jigsaw.

You guys should be asking who will take Walker's place, should he go.
BTW: wots this scuttlebutt about him leaving - where from?
Is it this SBNation rumor?
http://cartilagefreecaptain.sbnation.com/2017/5/4/15543708/tottenham-hotspur-mauricio-pochettino-kyle-walker-exit-rumors

It is true Walker is nowhere compared to backs, left or right, such as Marcelo. Or Dani Alvez.
He's maybe not even as good as David Luis, although he may have a couple of years advantage.
But he's certainly better than Trippier. A lot better.
So who would you have replace Walker?

So who would you have replace Walker?

-----------

sell walker for 60 mill to dopey man city and then scout properly and pick up someone just as good on the continent for about 15

Almost sounds like you are talking about having a poo.