Spurs or United?

If you take the Europa out of it... I'd far rather be in spurs position.... Great, entertaining football all season or a dull season with a scraped cup final win?

Spurs are a team on the up a solid foundation and playing style.

Utd easily for the Europa alone. The league cup is a crap competition, and almost worthless, but still a trophy. Spurs would have 2 nd place in prem, winning nothing.

Spurs are improving season on season. In the long term, that's more satisfying than United simply buying their way out of their relative doldrums.

Face it, if there were no footie forums, everyone would be saying how well Spurs are doing. Most of the comments on here are aimed at Spurs fans and not the club. Points scoring, basically.

For the fans, United. For the clubs themselves, a bit closer. If you win the Europa then United.

comment by Kante's Dad-Heavy Jumbo (U20563)
posted 10 hours, 30 minutes ago
Chelsea and Spurs are the only 2 of the 'big' six who don't need half a billions worth of new shiny Pogberts.
-------------
Wrong!

Liverpool need a couple of decent defenders and a keeper.

You had one in Sahko but he didn't want to go to Klopp's nudist colony. And you need to get shot of Sturridge to West Ham or someone of their ilk.

Spurs have lots of talent and loads of energy but still lack an on-field leader that can pull them together when they fall behind in games, as was proven in yesterday's game with WHU. As some commentators noted, many of the team looked shell-shocked after the goal was scored and Harry Kane's little hand clapping routine had no effect.

Despite winning the Carling Cup in 07/08, I know for a fact I enjoyed and preferred our 09/10, 10/11, 11/12, 14/15 and 15/16 seasons more despite winning zilch in any of them

A trophy + CL qualification will easily trump 2nd place and nothing. Really no argument.