or to join or start a new Discussion

15 Comments
Article Rating 3.67 Stars

Aurier - 'Exclusivity clause'. Genius!!

This probably explained why Manu and Chelsea didn't get involved in trying to prise away Aurier. There were even rumours ManU were his preferred option which gave some fans the jitters. Also both teams had been using non natural right backs in Valencia and Moses.
No more doing all the leg work and then having some cants flashing their cash and hijacking the move..

Great move, Levy.

http://www.hitc.com/en-gb/2017/09/01/report-chelsea-tried-to-hijack-tottenhams-23m-aurier-move-levys/

posted on 1/9/17

Comment Deleted by Site Moderator

posted on 1/9/17

comment by Conte'nt (U20893)
posted 7 seconds ago
No big clubs were in for Aurier. Definitely not Chelsea anyway. He was made available for sale at the end of last season. So they had plenty of time to seal this deal if they wanted to. This "exclussivity clause" is an utter bollox from the usual crap from Daily Fail
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Chelsea had loads of time to seal many deals did they?

posted on 1/9/17

Chelsea signed six players, but let the same amount of players go. Everton were the only club who signed more players than Chelsea this transfer window.

comment by SB&S (U17757)

posted on 1/9/17

Perhaps Daniel has learned after the Willian debacle. Still, if the player hadn't wanted to join he couldn't be forced could he. All this nonsense about wanting to join other clubs is just clickbait.

posted on 1/9/17

comment by Conte'nt (U20893)
posted 7 minutes ago
No big clubs were in for Aurier. Definitely not Chelsea anyway. He was made available for sale at the end of last season. So they had plenty of time to seal this deal if they wanted to. This "exclussivity clause" is an utter bollox from the usual crap from Daily Fail
----------------------------------------------------------------------

I think you're hurt after all the snubbing you suffered in the last 48 hrs, awww
πŸ˜‚
Chelsea tried a William trick I am guessing here with Aurier but Levy was too smart

I think Chelsea thought they'll hoodwink their fans by sneaking a player who's destined to Spurs and get a player non one wants Drinky to appease their glory boys fans

πŸ˜‚

posted on 1/9/17

comment by Diamondlights (U20501)
posted 20 minutes ago
Fair Play to Darth... He's a sneaky smart SOB despite some of our frustrations with him. For what its worth I read this am that Everton refused to even talk to us over Barkely yesterday as they know what his game is & were not prepared to play ball & that's the reason Barkley back tracked on the deal as he knew he was being shoehorned into the only offer on the table.... Perhaps Dan needs to learn this lesson & mix it up a bit. We all agree that paying Everton the 50mln they wanted was madness & never gonna happen but couldn't we have got the deal done 36 hours earlier for $35mln. ??????? Were Chelsea really gonna fight us that hard knowing the they were the only game in town for Drinkwater.... Neither of them are gonna start for them anyway
..................................................................... ......
They say he is out till December. Why buy him now for 35 and pay his wages when we can get him in Jan for much less. He wants to come to us so we can just give him a huge sign on fee.

posted on 1/9/17

comment by Desperate Dier (U6468)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by Diamondlights (U20501)
posted 20 minutes ago
Fair Play to Darth... He's a sneaky smart SOB despite some of our frustrations with him. For what its worth I read this am that Everton refused to even talk to us over Barkely yesterday as they know what his game is & were not prepared to play ball & that's the reason Barkley back tracked on the deal as he knew he was being shoehorned into the only offer on the table.... Perhaps Dan needs to learn this lesson & mix it up a bit. We all agree that paying Everton the 50mln they wanted was madness & never gonna happen but couldn't we have got the deal done 36 hours earlier for $35mln. ??????? Were Chelsea really gonna fight us that hard knowing the they were the only game in town for Drinkwater.... Neither of them are gonna start for them anyway
..................................................................... ......
They say he is out till December. Why buy him now for 35 and pay his wages when we can get him in Jan for much less. He wants to come to us so we can just give him a huge sign on fee.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I agree mate, my point was that Everton refusing to deal with us on deadline day is slightly worrying that Darth has created such a rep for himself that It might be detrimental to us in the future. Being a pain in the B@llz is all well and good but as proved yesterday its getting harder & harder to get deals done. Overall I thought he did well but having signed Llorente I would have loved Mahrez (someone who can beat a man & put in a good cross), I'm pretty sure LLorente scored the most headers in the league

posted on 1/9/17

Comment Deleted by Site Moderator

posted on 1/9/17

comment by 🎢🎡 TOP GEEZ 🎡🎢 (U15856)
posted 1 hour, 4 minutes ago
Presumably we can try and negotiate with Everton over the next few months and have a move agreed with them before the window actually re-opens?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
makes sense to me

comment by SB&S (U17757)

posted on 1/9/17

comment by Diamondlights (U20501)
posted 4 hours, 18 minutes ago
comment by 🎢🎡 TOP GEEZ 🎡🎢 (U15856)
posted 1 hour, 4 minutes ago
Presumably we can try and negotiate with Everton over the next few months and have a move agreed with them before the window actually re-opens?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
makes sense to me
----------------------------------------------------------------------
He can do his own deal in January. Ok he cannot leave until June next year but still.

Sign in if you want to comment
RATE THIS ARTICLE
Rate Breakdown
5
0 Votes
4
0 Votes
3
0 Votes
2
0 Votes
1
0 Votes

Average Rating: 3.67 from 3 votes

ARTICLE STATS
Day
Article RankingNot Ranked
Article ViewsNot Available
Average Time(mins)Not Available
Total Time(mins)Not Available
Month
Article RankingNot Ranked
Article ViewsNot Available
Average Time(mins)Not Available
Total Time(mins)Not Available