Davinson Sanchez owns Dani Alves

Ken bates £1

Hold on. Why are you laughing at something I put. a club that cost 1 quid has won more than yours.

spurs

Sanchez looks likes will be the replacement for Alderweireled (Spurs best defender) who will join Man City next year for a cut down price.

comment by Nickasaurus (U9257)
posted 3 hours, 42 minutes ago
comment by Ledders' knee surgeon - Football Manager Icon. (U20121)
posted 24 minutes ago
comment by Tomkins (U1116)
posted 5 hours, 11 minutes ago
When is the DVD out?
----------------------------------------------------------------------

You ever seen your team win a trophy?

----------------------------------------------------------------------
Have you? like more than 1...
----------------------------------------------------------------------

I've seen Spurs win more trophies than you've seen vaginaaaas #virgin

comment by Don_tottenham (U3372)
posted 6 hours, 22 minutes ago
Spurs historically are a much bigger club than Chelsea. Check the history son. Football wasn't invented when Roman money bags took over.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Just because you can't remember past sucking on your mmmys t1t, don't mean we all can't.

When did $purs ever get 82,000 for a league match?

In fact Chelsea have had numerous higher crowds than your highest ever, even since you've moved into Wembley and given away tickets in Kellogs cornflakes boxes, you haven't come near.

Here's a challenge for you - Go check the history yourself and count up since WW1, who out of $purs and Chelsea, have had more higher league placings than the other!

When you've done the maths come back and speak to me!

If you're going to gob off, get your facts right sonny!



http://lebuzz.eurosport.co.uk/viral/70000-empty-seats-tottenham-hotspurs-first-game-season-wembley-stadium-30680/

Lolz using the Juventus link

Well known the American company running that game ( not Spurs ) were trying to rip us fans off so we boycotted it

You couldn't be bothered you mean. That's an aside anyway to motoormouth that thinks he can bull$hit his way around life.

Much as a western gunslinger always ran into someone faster, mouth of on here and you'll run into someone who'll see through your chaff!

comment by BrummieBlue! (U3487)
posted 5 minutes ago
You couldn't be bothered you mean. That's an aside anyway to motoormouth that thinks he can bull$hit his way around life.

Much as a western gunslinger always ran into someone faster, mouth of on here and you'll run into someone who'll see through your chaff!
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I mean what I wrote

comment by BrummieBlue! (U3487)
posted 11 hours, 56 minutes ago
comment by Don_tottenham (U3372)
posted 6 hours, 22 minutes ago
Spurs historically are a much bigger club than Chelsea. Check the history son. Football wasn't invented when Roman money bags took over.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Just because you can't remember past sucking on your mmmys t1t, don't mean we all can't.

When did $purs ever get 82,000 for a league match?

In fact Chelsea have had numerous higher crowds than your highest ever, even since you've moved into Wembley and given away tickets in Kellogs cornflakes boxes, you haven't come near.

Here's a challenge for you - Go check the history yourself and count up since WW1, who out of $purs and Chelsea, have had more higher league placings than the other!

When you've done the maths come back and speak to me!

If you're going to gob off, get your facts right sonny!



http://lebuzz.eurosport.co.uk/viral/70000-empty-seats-tottenham-hotspurs-first-game-season-wembley-stadium-30680/



----------------------------------------------------------------------

Sounds like effort, can you just tell me the answer?

I'm assuming you're stopping when you get to the Abramovich era though, seeing as that's what this whole discussion was about?
Also, what made you choose the arbitrary timescale of 'since WW1'?

comment by Philspurs - Millionaire travel agent (U3278)
posted 11 hours, 23 minutes ago
comment by BrummieBlue! (U3487)
posted 11 hours, 56 minutes ago
comment by Don_tottenham (U3372)
posted 6 hours, 22 minutes ago
Spurs historically are a much bigger club than Chelsea. Check the history son. Football wasn't invented when Roman money bags took over.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Just because you can't remember past sucking on your mmmys t1t, don't mean we all can't.

When did $purs ever get 82,000 for a league match?

In fact Chelsea have had numerous higher crowds than your highest ever, even since you've moved into Wembley and given away tickets in Kellogs cornflakes boxes, you haven't come near.

Here's a challenge for you - Go check the history yourself and count up since WW1, who out of $purs and Chelsea, have had more higher league placings than the other!

When you've done the maths come back and speak to me!

If you're going to gob off, get your facts right sonny!



http://lebuzz.eurosport.co.uk/viral/70000-empty-seats-tottenham-hotspurs-first-game-season-wembley-stadium-30680/



----------------------------------------------------------------------

Sounds like effort, can you just tell me the answer?

I'm assuming you're stopping when you get to the Abramovich era though, seeing as that's what this whole discussion was about?
Also, what made you choose the arbitrary timescale of 'since WW1'?
----------------------------------------------------------------------

1. Why would I stop at the RA era when you hadn't had any league placings higher than us for at least eight seasons prior to that?

2. Why go back prior to WW1, when there had been no competition during the war years for obvious reasons. Isn't over 100 years enough for you?

3. The answer to your 1st question is that Chelsea have had more higher placed league finishes (be it either of us being in Div 1 or 2 at the time) than $purs!

I hope that satisfactorily answers your questions!