Jesse Lingard

comment by kneerash-23 Cara Gold (U6876)
posted 1 hour, 10 minutes ago
They sure did, was at the 0-5 game, still they're cantsLed by the blondie king of cants

Not a bit bitter about it me
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I was at the game, it ended 1-5, Ireland took the fooking lead even

comment by Striketeam7 (U18109)
posted 1 hour, 44 minutes ago
comment by Bobby Dazzler (U1449)
posted 5 minutes ago
comment by Gaffer Pranks (U6283)
posted 3 seconds ago
Fackin useless cant missed 3 great chances
----------------------------------------------------------------------
One hit the post and was unlucky
One was a good save by the keeper
The other one fair enough
----------------------------------------------------------------------

It was not a good save by the keeper, it was a bad miss by Lingard, the keeper should not have had a chance.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
So any time a keeper makes a good save it's a bad miss?

comment by Striketeam7 (U18109)
posted 42 minutes ago
Welbeck is a good sub to have, if we need a goal with 20 mins to go then I would want him on, he would have buried those Lingard chances.

Vardy would have been useless yesterday, he needs space to run into and Tunisia left none.

Rashford for sterling next game in opinion, Rashford isn't scared of taking players on
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Welbeck is a poor finisher, I wouldn't be so sure he'd have buried any of those chances.

Nah I'm also not buying welbs would have scored them...but poor from lingard.

Still we won...further proof VAR is a joke.

Should be comfortable Sunday....then we can semi realx for the Belgium game.

In terms of not having to win....

comment by New lane (U21769)
posted 2 minutes ago
Nah I'm also not buying welbs would have scored them...but poor from lingard.

Still we won...further proof VAR is a joke.

Should be comfortable Sunday....then we can semi realx for the Belgium game.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
The finishing was poor, although the one-on-one chance was tricky and he was unlucky to hit the post.

Normally he's pretty dangerous between 12 and 25 yards though. Definitely didn't have his shooting boots on yesterday.

tbh Welbeck should start with Kane. England don't have enough goal scorers and Welbeck works harder from wide positions than Lingard or Sterling.

He has 16 goals in 39 Apps. Thats not too shabby for International level.

comment by Clog Wearing Donkey (U1250)
posted 1 hour, 21 minutes ago
comment by kneerash-23 Cara Gold (U6876)
posted 1 hour, 10 minutes ago
They sure did, was at the 0-5 game, still they're cantsLed by the blondie king of cants

Not a bit bitter about it me
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I was at the game, it ended 1-5, Ireland took the fooking lead even
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Oh yeah forget that, was a horrible experience I want to forget, still just paid 190 for this years season ticket though!

Lingard got into great positions (unlike Alli) and also put one on a plate for sterling.

At least he hit the target with the first and the second was a great bit of play.

He has a history of scoring when it matters so I'll let him off. His display was encouraging imo.

I'd also opt for Welbs next to Kane, his link up play is under rated. With the pace and movement if those around him he could be very useful.