After selling Solanke..

Yep we've wasted money on some duds.

It's obviously your turn now, and blimey as a club you're doing fantastic job of doing just that.

The OP said it was from 2014. You know, the year Utd became shiiite.

Why is what I'm saying so hard to understand? I'm not saying you've spent more money than City. I'm saying Liverpool have basically started doing what Man City have done to be successful, so they can't claim like they're doing things right compared to City when they're doing the exact same thing City have done for years which is spend huge amounts of money on ready made players. What is the difference other than the fact that the money comes from different places? You're still spending it! Money is money regardless of where it comes from.

very true

weve spent 569m and youve spent i believe 450m?

FA Cup, League cup and europa is all we have to show for that investment though sadly.

what do you have to show for 450m?

TOOR it's not £90m but £159.42m based on transferleague. Basic maths.

comment by Jose Mourinho, just the Portuguese Fat Sam, teaching 19th century football. Klopp is the better manager, and Eva Caniero was right. #Hazard knows. (U21750)
posted 10 hours, 17 minutes ago
comment by Robbing_Hoody - as a rule I don't trust a man who doesn't drink but I do trust James Milner (U6374)
posted 5 seconds ago
comment by Jose Mourinho, just the Portuguese Fat Sam, teaching 19th century football. Klopp is the better manager, and Eva Caniero was right. #Hazard knows. (U21750)
posted 59 seconds ago
comment by Jose Mourinho, just the Portuguese Fat Sam, teaching 19th century football. Klopp is the better manager, and Eva Caniero was right. #Hazard knows. (U21750)
posted 13 minutes ago
Well Liverpool's net spend last summer was -£129m. I wouldn't call that sell to buy...
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Add onto that -£129m, the £70m spent on Van Dijk and £40m each on Salah and Oxlade Chamberlain the previous season too
----------------------------------------------------------------------

And what?

Professional football club in spending money on footballers that it generated from football shocker.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Well someone said your club had to sell to buy and I thought that was a little ridiculous.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Because like i said klopps net spend average is 12m per window 24m per year hes been here.... peps spent 400m net since aug 2016 thats 80m net per window 160m per season yet according to you we’ve done a city Because we spent 129m (probably wrong) net according to you in one window? Since then we’ve recouped another 40m from ings and solanke too.

If you think 12m and 24m is going above and beyond cities 80m and 160m or even matching them then idk what else to say its over 6 times less than them. This is a team that already had the bigger better more expensive squad too. Every manager inthe top 6 other than poch probably has a higher netspend than klopp maybe even one or two others in the prem too.

Current net spend managers
Emery - 66m 2 windows
Pep - 400m 5 windows
Mourinho - 280m 4 windows
Sarri - 160m 2 windows
Silva - 60m 2 windows?
Klopp - 72m 6 windows
Poch - 18m 9 windows

comment by Benji Veniamin (U19953)
posted 6 hours, 49 minutes ago
very true

weve spent 569m and youve spent i believe 450m?

FA Cup, League cup and europa is all we have to show for that investment though sadly.

what do you have to show for 450m?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
A huge amount of progress and the best squad we've had in the PL. We will see in a few months what we have to show for it in terms of trophies.

comment by Benji Veniamin (U19953)
posted 7 hours, 19 minutes ago
very true

weve spent 569m and youve spent i believe 450m?

FA Cup, League cup and europa is all we have to show for that investment though sadly.

what do you have to show for 450m?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
That’s just painting over the cracks, big style. Not one person will deny that Liverpool are miles ahead of United at the moment in terms of being where they want to be as a club. United are a complete mess, successive managers have stagnated/regressed you. It’s the polar opposite to us, who have a manager who has us playing how the fans want them to, and are showing massive improvement compared to previous management.

Lol how bad must Liverpool be to finish behind us in most seasons since SAF left lol.

comment by Inbefore (U20589)
posted 2 hours, 14 minutes ago
If you think 12m and 24m is going above and beyond cities 80m and 160m or even matching them then idk what else to say its over 6 times less than them. This is a team that already had the bigger better more expensive squad too. Every manager inthe top 6 other than poch probably has a higher netspend than klopp maybe even one or two others in the prem too.

Current net spend managers
Emery - 66m 2 windows
Pep - 400m 5 windows
Mourinho - 280m 4 windows
Sarri - 160m 2 windows
Silva - 60m 2 windows?
Klopp - 72m 6 windows
Poch - 18m 9 windows


----------------------------------------------------------------------

IMO this is far more relevant that going back to 2014.

It could be argued at some level the agents fees and wages that are hidden behind these numbers may be proportional to the levels of fees. Its hard to say though.

The money spent by chelsea just this year is interesting.

But once again it shows the work done by spurs over 5 years to get to where they are at.