Another Poxit for Spurs in a semi: why?

Do the math, 15 in 16 year's takes us back to 2003, my first cup final was 94, I will not count the full members cup. So I believe I hear you by a couple.

Best you by a couple. I'm also not counting the 1970 final as I wasn't there either.

comment by JFDI (U1657)
posted 10 hours, 2 minutes ago
Do the math, 15 in 16 year's takes us back to 2003, my first cup final was 94, I will not count the full members cup. So I believe I hear you by a couple.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

So you are basically a jump on the bandwagon, when Chelsea borrowed money they could not pay back supporter of the 1990s continuing on to be a lottery winner supporter of the 21st century then.

comment by sandy (U20567)
posted 2 hours, 57 minutes ago
comment by JFDI (U1657)
posted 10 hours, 2 minutes ago
Do the math, 15 in 16 year's takes us back to 2003, my first cup final was 94, I will not count the full members cup. So I believe I hear you by a couple.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

So you are basically a jump on the bandwagon, when Chelsea borrowed money they could not pay back supporter of the 1990s continuing on to be a lottery winner supporter of the 21st century then.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

The Full Members Cup was a competition in the 80s.

Again you show your lack of football knowledge for someone who claims he is not a Sky plastic

comment by CFC: FFP Champions (U20729)
posted 39 minutes ago
comment by sandy (U20567)
posted 2 hours, 57 minutes ago
comment by JFDI (U1657)
posted 10 hours, 2 minutes ago
Do the math, 15 in 16 year's takes us back to 2003, my first cup final was 94, I will not count the full members cup. So I believe I hear you by a couple.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

So you are basically a jump on the bandwagon, when Chelsea borrowed money they could not pay back supporter of the 1990s continuing on to be a lottery winner supporter of the 21st century then.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

The Full Members Cup was a competition in the 80s.

Again you show your lack of football knowledge for someone who claims he is not a Sky plastic
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It's got to be an age thing, he couldn't even get his head around the 1970 cup final. It also probably stings a little for him to know there are a few of us about that have seen Chelsea win more than his beloved team. And to be fair, the 80s and 90s are a bit of a grey zone for spurs fans given they out spent most and won very little for it.

comment by JFDI (U1657)
posted 2 hours, 3 minutes ago
comment by CFC: FFP Champions (U20729)
posted 39 minutes ago
comment by sandy (U20567)
posted 2 hours, 57 minutes ago
comment by JFDI (U1657)
posted 10 hours, 2 minutes ago
Do the math, 15 in 16 year's takes us back to 2003, my first cup final was 94, I will not count the full members cup. So I believe I hear you by a couple.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

So you are basically a jump on the bandwagon, when Chelsea borrowed money they could not pay back supporter of the 1990s continuing on to be a lottery winner supporter of the 21st century then.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

The Full Members Cup was a competition in the 80s.

Again you show your lack of football knowledge for someone who claims he is not a Sky plastic
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It's got to be an age thing, he couldn't even get his head around the 1970 cup final. It also probably stings a little for him to know there are a few of us about that have seen Chelsea win more than his beloved team. And to be fair, the 80s and 90s are a bit of a grey zone for spurs fans given they out spent most and won very little for it.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Chelsea spent money they could not pay back in the 1990s to try to keep up with the big boys, resulting in them nearly going bust had to be brought for a pound, and then finally had to get bailed out by a lottery win. You know you would not have been winning much without the lottery funding. The one or two trophies you won the the 1990s before the money arrived were brought on the back of money you could not possibly pay back.

The 1970 Final I remember very well, one of the best I have seen, so yes I can get my head around it, and I believe it was the first FA Cup Chelsea had ever won, exactly 70 years after Spurs won their first.

comment by sandy (U20567)
posted 12 minutes ago
comment by JFDI (U1657)
posted 2 hours, 3 minutes ago
comment by CFC: FFP Champions (U20729)
posted 39 minutes ago
comment by sandy (U20567)
posted 2 hours, 57 minutes ago
comment by JFDI (U1657)
posted 10 hours, 2 minutes ago
Do the math, 15 in 16 year's takes us back to 2003, my first cup final was 94, I will not count the full members cup. So I believe I hear you by a couple.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

So you are basically a jump on the bandwagon, when Chelsea borrowed money they could not pay back supporter of the 1990s continuing on to be a lottery winner supporter of the 21st century then.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

The Full Members Cup was a competition in the 80s.

Again you show your lack of football knowledge for someone who claims he is not a Sky plastic
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It's got to be an age thing, he couldn't even get his head around the 1970 cup final. It also probably stings a little for him to know there are a few of us about that have seen Chelsea win more than his beloved team. And to be fair, the 80s and 90s are a bit of a grey zone for spurs fans given they out spent most and won very little for it.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Chelsea spent money they could not pay back in the 1990s to try to keep up with the big boys, resulting in them nearly going bust had to be brought for a pound, and then finally had to get bailed out by a lottery win. You know you would not have been winning much without the lottery funding. The one or two trophies you won the the 1990s before the money arrived were brought on the back of money you could not possibly pay back.

The 1970 Final I remember very well, one of the best I have seen, so yes I can get my head around it, and I believe it was the first FA Cup Chelsea had ever won, exactly 70 years after Spurs won their first.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
70 that's impressive history, glory glory Tottenham Hotspur and all that yet you call us glory hunters.

I know you are old but your timeline and knowledge of our history is way off. For starters we were bought for a pound in the 80s, we spent well towards the mid 90s with the backing of Harding as you did with Sugars money in the late 80s early 90s only we were more successful. As for folding, could of would of should of, the fact is we haven't, we may or may not have run a risk but it has paid off, fortune favours the brave.

As for the 70s cup final if you should remember it you should also realise the error of your earlier assumption with regards my support of Chelsea which 8s the only reason I bought it up again in my last post.

Sandy just one small correction to your statement there mate. Chelsea being sold for a pound happened in 1982 when Bates bought the Club, this time around when Bates sold to Abramovich I think if memory serves that the Club was valued at somewhere in the region of 60 mill.

comment by sandy (U20567)
posted 4 hours, 23 minutes ago
comment by JFDI (U1657)
posted 2 hours, 3 minutes ago
comment by CFC: FFP Champions (U20729)
posted 39 minutes ago
comment by sandy (U20567)
posted 2 hours, 57 minutes ago
comment by JFDI (U1657)
posted 10 hours, 2 minutes ago
Do the math, 15 in 16 year's takes us back to 2003, my first cup final was 94, I will not count the full members cup. So I believe I hear you by a couple.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

So you are basically a jump on the bandwagon, when Chelsea borrowed money they could not pay back supporter of the 1990s continuing on to be a lottery winner supporter of the 21st century then.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

The Full Members Cup was a competition in the 80s.

Again you show your lack of football knowledge for someone who claims he is not a Sky plastic
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It's got to be an age thing, he couldn't even get his head around the 1970 cup final. It also probably stings a little for him to know there are a few of us about that have seen Chelsea win more than his beloved team. And to be fair, the 80s and 90s are a bit of a grey zone for spurs fans given they out spent most and won very little for it.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Chelsea spent money they could not pay back in the 1990s to try to keep up with the big boys, resulting in them nearly going bust had to be brought for a pound, and then finally had to get bailed out by a lottery win. You know you would not have been winning much without the lottery funding. The one or two trophies you won the the 1990s before the money arrived were brought on the back of money you could not possibly pay back.

The 1970 Final I remember very well, one of the best I have seen, so yes I can get my head around it, and I believe it was the first FA Cup Chelsea had ever won, exactly 70 years after Spurs won their first.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

How is it possible to have watched football for so long
And be wrong about everything

You must be a Sky Johnny come lately to believe all this tripe.

Real old school Spurs know their onions

comment by sandy (U20567)
posted 2 days, 15 hours ago
comment by CFC: FFP Champions (U20729)
posted 59 minutes ago
comment by sandy (U20567)
posted 1 hour, 51 minutes ago
comment by Chelsea_since_summer_1969 ✯ (U1561)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Mr Chelsea. (U3579)
posted 3 hours, 9 minutes ago
comment by Bov (U6696)
posted 51 minutes ago
comment by Devonshirespur (U6316)
posted 42 minutes ago
Yeah, Spurs shorn of their first choice front line have more possession, more shots, more shots on target but were 'played off the park' and 'over whelmed' and spent their time kicking Chelsea
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Home TeamChelseaAway TeamTottenham
Possession
Home54%Away46%
Shots
Home21Away5
Shots on Target
Home5Away1
Corners
Home8Away4
Fouls
Home9Away16
Don't know what game you were watching. Outplayed in both legs and a lucky penalty to give you a lead. Try and keep up
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Laugh at the blind bat DevonshireSpur
----------------------------------------------------------------------
...awkward.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Top be honest I would sooner outplay Chelsea in the Prem game, get the 3 points on the way to CL football next season, than win a semi, lose the final and probably finish outside the top four. Each to their own though I suppose.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Funny, for the past Six years you’ve been saying how you wanted Spurs to take domestic cups seriously.

So fickle: you must be female
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Why such a small crowd last night CCP, couldn`t even sell out a semi-final. Spurs sold their allocation, it was the Chelsea fans that didn`t turn up.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can see the thousands of empty seats in the Spurs end here on Spurs end TV at start of video.

And enjoy Chelsea beating Sours!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CkFXY4gWaaE