Just a thought, how about Stan using the might of Wall Mart to sponser us, imagine how much money they could bring to the club, then we could attract better players and start winning things again.
I hear there some deals that expire in 2014 ones that due to desperation we took maybe because we are a bit better financially we can up them too.
Browse:
Sponsership
comment by Darwin ♲ (U1378)
posted on 21/9/11
Would there not be a conflict of interest somewhere? It's not like we're Man City... we don't get away with stuff
comment by Afc-Pete (U5794)
posted on 21/9/11
He does not own Wall Mart so no there is technically no reason.
comment by Oscandwarf (U3677)
posted on 21/9/11
But there are considerable links between Enos and Wal Mart, are there not?
Can't really criticise Man City for getting the owner's brother to give the manager 400 million on a whim, then expect AFC to get it's owner's wife to spend huge sums on a sponsorship deal.
That would smack of hypocricy.
The main sponsorship deals are due for renewal in 2014 and the sums received will increase, unless the skys fall in and the club does really, really badly.
At the same time, second string sponsors are being taken on all the time. In the last year or so AFC have agreed sponsorship deals with Citroen, Indicit and a few others.
While not generating the hundreds of millions Man City play with, getting more of these will boost available money at the club. It's not bad news on the sponsorship front.
comment by Lexington 125.2 (U8879)
posted on 21/9/11
From the Emirates stadium to the Asda stadium?
What's the chances of the Arsenal board "rolling back the prices" on the cost of season tickets?
RATE THIS ARTICLE
ARTICLE STATS
Day
Article RankingNot Ranked
Article ViewsNot Available
Average Time(mins)Not Available
Total Time(mins)Not Available
Month
Article RankingNot Ranked
Article ViewsNot Available
Average Time(mins)Not Available
Total Time(mins)Not Available