Morelos: no ban.

comment by NNH (U10730)
posted 7 minutes ago
‘Describing it as 'attacking players genitals' is vastly over selling it IMO.’

‘I don't know what he actually did.’


----------------------------------------------------------------------

I don't know exactly what he did but I know he didn't 'attack a players genitals' that's for sure.

The reason I don't know exactly what he did is because he barely touched him.

Are you seriously saying you think Morelos got away with an actual 'attack' on someones genitals!? Deary me.

Hysterical doesn't even come close.

And as for the Brown incident (the one where Morelos is clearly looking at the ball when it happens) you are seriously calling that an attack on someones genitals?

Was that the first OF game you had ever seen?

comment by Hot Shot Hamish (U21959)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by NNH (U10730)
posted 7 minutes ago
‘Describing it as 'attacking players genitals' is vastly over selling it IMO.’

‘I don't know what he actually did.’


----------------------------------------------------------------------

I don't know exactly what he did but I know he didn't 'attack a players genitals' that's for sure.

The reason I don't know exactly what he did is because he barely touched him.

Are you seriously saying you think Morelos got away with an actual 'attack' on someones genitals!?Deary me.

Hysterical doesn't even come close.

And as for the Brown incident (the one where Morelos is clearly looking at the ball when it happens) you are seriously calling that an attack on someones genitals?

Was that the first OF game you had ever seen?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
If you could be so kind as to stating where i said he attacked someones genitals then please enlighten me

comment by Hot Shot Hamish (U21959)
posted 34 minutes ago
If he didn’t attack them, what did he do?! Fondle them?! Caress them?!
--------------------------------------------------------------------
. If someone nails you in a tackle
----------------------------------------------------------------------

You must have meant that

comment by NNH (U10730)
posted 5 minutes ago
comment by Hot Shot Hamish (U21959)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by NNH (U10730)
posted 7 minutes ago
‘Describing it as 'attacking players genitals' is vastly over selling it IMO.’

‘I don't know what he actually did.’


----------------------------------------------------------------------

I don't know exactly what he did but I know he didn't 'attack a players genitals' that's for sure.

The reason I don't know exactly what he did is because he barely touched him.

Are you seriously saying you think Morelos got away with an actual 'attack' on someones genitals!?Deary me.

Hysterical doesn't even come close.

And as for the Brown incident (the one where Morelos is clearly looking at the ball when it happens) you are seriously calling that an attack on someones genitals?

Was that the first OF game you had ever seen?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
If you could be so kind as to stating where i said he attacked someones genitals then please enlighten me
----------------------------------------------------------------------

It was POV that said it. The second half of the post was actually directed at him.

Apologies for tarring you with that brush.

I appreciate the embarrassment I have caused.

no apology nessecary.

I think the thing with Morelos is when he done that to Christie, it was a few weeks after McLean at Hearts got a 2 game ban for doing the same thing.

Just another case of the mental world of Scottish refereeing decisions.

Here’s the difference Hamish. Irrespective of the description, what Morelos did twice in one game, and then also standing on Ralston, is cowardly and snidey. But you won’t pass judgement on that. I said the other day that the Broadfoot and Morelos incident was a yellow card for each of them.

Morelos is one of the most cowardly and snidey players in the league just now. But you’re happy to condone his behaviour through silence, whilst you condemn others.

Like I said-myopic.

Comment Deleted by Site Moderator

comment by My POV (U10636)
posted 4 minutes ago
Here’s the difference Hamish. Irrespective of the description, what Morelos did twice in one game, and then also standing on Ralston, is cowardly and snidey. But you won’t pass judgement on that. I said the other day that the Broadfoot and Morelos incident was a yellow card for each of them.

Morelos is one of the most cowardly and snidey players in the league just now. But you’re happy to condone his behaviour through silence, whilst you condemn others.

Like I said-myopic.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

P1sh I am afraid.

I said only yesterday Morelos has been out of order and let the team down with his antics at times this season.

Against Aberdeen last week he was too concerned about getting involved in a running battle with the Aberdeen defenders that he forgot about actually trying to play football. He was getting some tough treatment from them but diving about trying to get them sent off was just a riddy.

I am not actually his biggest fan. I love him as a play player yes - but he has been a liability at times this season for sure.

I just view the OF incidents as completely different from the Broadfoot one.

On balance I would sell Morleos this summer - and for the very reason that his indiscipline lets the team down and I just don't think we need the hassle of him being on a disciplinary knife edge so often.

He is a good player but I think if we got anything approaching £15m for him we should be able to strengthen the team overall to compensate for his loss.

But you crack on with your assumptions and ill judged conclusions about what I am saying

Morelos was never getting banned once the video came out . Broadfoot is a big dirty bassa. Always thought he was a soft Kant at us as well