Right...who does it and how is it supposed to work?
Do you rate articles or not?
Is it the OP you are rating or the comments?
Sometimes an OP can be absolutely rubbish (for example, any of Heed's) but can contain some good comments. How do you rate that?
Alternatively, an OP can be absolutely brilliant (like this one) but not attract much comment or attention.
Or..do you just rate the article based on whether you like the poster or not.
Rating Articles
posted on 23/9/19
comment by Magnum (U16400)
posted 10 minutes ago
comment by Hot Shot Hamish (U21959)
posted 12 minutes ago
Rarely rate an article. Its a bit pointless and bizarre tbh. I have seen the most innocuous of articles given one star when even mother Theresa couldn't have found anything in them to be offended.
I have never filtered anybody. Theres bams on here who actually want to be filtered.
I have seen folk encouraging people to filter them - basically saying - go on filter me and show that I really get tae you. Its some sort of mad validation for them and the utter pash they hit out with on here.
The reality is it is quite the opposite for me. Anyone suggesting I filter them thinks their comments mean an awful lot more to me than they actually do
----------------------------------------------------------------------
They do seem to have made a bit of an impression to be fair.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I am not saying you cant get frustrated with their repetitive inane pash.
But is filtering necessary? not IMO.
posted on 23/9/19
Comment Deleted by Site Moderator
posted on 23/9/19
comment by Magnum (U16400)
posted 6 minutes ago
comment by Call Sign: Invictus (U3627)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by My POV (U10636)
posted 16 minutes ago
CS seems to have a hotline to admin for these types of things. Been a while since it was done.
Perhaps they could oblige?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
A poster got all upset at these stats.
A few stats caused friction so they were removed from the annual stat league but the posters who want to be offended found a way so I just stopped asking for them
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Was a shame that mate but you were right.
Used to get a great laugh from that stuff though.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Surely as a one-off, for old times sake then it could be done?!
posted on 23/9/19
comment by Hot Shot Hamish (U21959)
posted 20 minutes ago
comment by Magnum (U16400)
posted 10 minutes ago
comment by Hot Shot Hamish (U21959)
posted 12 minutes ago
Rarely rate an article. Its a bit pointless and bizarre tbh. I have seen the most innocuous of articles given one star when even mother Theresa couldn't have found anything in them to be offended.
I have never filtered anybody. Theres bams on here who actually want to be filtered.
I have seen folk encouraging people to filter them - basically saying - go on filter me and show that I really get tae you. Its some sort of mad validation for them and the utter pash they hit out with on here.
The reality is it is quite the opposite for me. Anyone suggesting I filter them thinks their comments mean an awful lot more to me than they actually do
----------------------------------------------------------------------
They do seem to have made a bit of an impression to be fair.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I am not saying you cant get frustrated with their repetitive inane pash.
But is filtering necessary? not IMO.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You've got an answer for everything mate.
Apart from that one awkward question about your previous persona on here of course.
posted on 23/9/19
I'm the invisible four star bandito
posted on 23/9/19
Comment Deleted by Site Moderator
posted on 23/9/19
Comment Deleted by Site Moderator
posted on 23/9/19
Comment Deleted by Site Moderator
posted on 23/9/19
comment by Magnum (U16400)
posted 50 minutes ago
comment by Hot Shot Hamish (U21959)
posted 20 minutes ago
comment by Magnum (U16400)
posted 10 minutes ago
comment by Hot Shot Hamish (U21959)
posted 12 minutes ago
Rarely rate an article. Its a bit pointless and bizarre tbh. I have seen the most innocuous of articles given one star when even mother Theresa couldn't have found anything in them to be offended.
I have never filtered anybody. Theres bams on here who actually want to be filtered.
I have seen folk encouraging people to filter them - basically saying - go on filter me and show that I really get tae you. Its some sort of mad validation for them and the utter pash they hit out with on here.
The reality is it is quite the opposite for me. Anyone suggesting I filter them thinks their comments mean an awful lot more to me than they actually do
----------------------------------------------------------------------
They do seem to have made a bit of an impression to be fair.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I am not saying you cant get frustrated with their repetitive inane pash.
But is filtering necessary? not IMO.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You've got an answer for everything mate.
Apart from that one awkward question about your previous persona on here of course.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Its not awkward at all for me.
Its just completely irrelevant
posted on 24/9/19
comment by Hot Shot Hamish (U21959)
posted 19 hours, 9 minutes ago
comment by Magnum (U16400)
posted 50 minutes ago
comment by Hot Shot Hamish (U21959)
posted 20 minutes ago
comment by Magnum (U16400)
posted 10 minutes ago
comment by Hot Shot Hamish (U21959)
posted 12 minutes ago
Rarely rate an article. Its a bit pointless and bizarre tbh. I have seen the most innocuous of articles given one star when even mother Theresa couldn't have found anything in them to be offended.
I have never filtered anybody. Theres bams on here who actually want to be filtered.
I have seen folk encouraging people to filter them - basically saying - go on filter me and show that I really get tae you. Its some sort of mad validation for them and the utter pash they hit out with on here.
The reality is it is quite the opposite for me. Anyone suggesting I filter them thinks their comments mean an awful lot more to me than they actually do
----------------------------------------------------------------------
They do seem to have made a bit of an impression to be fair.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I am not saying you cant get frustrated with their repetitive inane pash.
But is filtering necessary? not IMO.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You've got an answer for everything mate.
Apart from that one awkward question about your previous persona on here of course.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Its not awkward at all for me.
Its just completely irrelevant
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Not to Fan