Just stumbled on this guy's tweets.
On a one man mission to defend his club even in the face of sustained assault from multiple jpournalists.
His crime?
He often calls them out for their hypocrisy.This makes them really mad.
Didn't realise there is a such coordinated and sustained assault on City by a gang of journalists on twitter.
Sad.
City_Rabin aka Blinkered Crackpot
posted on 25/5/20
comment by mancini (U7179)
posted 1 hour, 6 minutes ago
https://blinkeredcrackpots.wordpress.com/2020/05/17/the-man-behind-the-men-behind-manchester-city/
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Anyone can write anything on a blog and not stick their name to it.
Why haven’t they put their name to it?
posted on 25/5/20
Why should they if it contains enough links to prove their point.
How many people use their real name on this forum?
posted on 25/5/20
Yeah just read it. It’s an opinion piece with no name. What does this supposedly prove?
posted on 25/5/20
If it was pro Liverpool you wouldn't have given a fek if it was written by Pol Pot.
posted on 25/5/20
comment by gratedbean (U4885)
posted 1 day ago
Talksport are certainly more truthful than your clubs social media following. That’s all we can say for sure.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yeah WHAT ABOUT THEM?
It just doesnt stop
posted on 25/5/20
comment by Boris 'Inky’ Gibson (U5901)
posted 5 minutes ago
If it was pro Liverpool you wouldn't have given a fek if it was written by Pol Pot.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yeah and WHAT ABOUT THEM?
Fml
posted on 25/5/20
comment by Boris 'Inky’ Gibson (U5901)
posted 12 minutes ago
If it was pro Liverpool you wouldn't have given a fek if it was written by Pol Pot.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Well it’s not is it.
You could’ve typed that. Ok perhaps not. Anyone could’ve typed that. It’s an opinion piece and that’s it.
posted on 25/5/20
...and you find his opinion invalid because it doesn't suit your agenda.
posted on 25/5/20
comment by Boris 'Inky’ Gibson (U5901)
posted 9 minutes ago
...and you find his opinion invalid because it doesn't suit your agenda.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
No, I find their anonymous opinion invalid because it’s an opinion. Anyone can go on the internet and publish an anonymous blog
posted on 25/5/20
Which parts of the article do you disagree with?
I assume you've fact-checked all his claims.