PULISIC , HOW GOOD CAN HE BECOME

Been impressed with what I’ve seen of him, looks a good signing so far

I was talking to a friend earlier, Man Utd fan, and I reckon in puli and Utd with Bruno, we could possibly in 2 years have two players battling for best player in the league with the likes of kdb

Top quality management by Frank.

To think there are/were loons that crucify Frank' treatment of Pulisic.
Anyone with a brain knows that Frank has been doing his utmost to extract the best/most out of Pulisic all along.

Frank' faith and appropriate measures in which he has improved Pulisic is monumental.
Goalscoring output...including first career hat-trick against Burnley away of all places, is testament to that. Never been so productive and ruthless in his career.

top drawer...quick & incisive

Needs to stay fit & not get clattered by some ox of a defender & we have a gem

Can't wait until our new signings are available,..they should purr together

Pulisic was bought a year before the ban to contravene the ban so even during a ban, Chelsea did a transfer and got a player?
Makes a mockery of imposing a ban To a team that has broken a rule previously.
The current 5 subs also is another massive help to the teams that have multiple quality players on the bench.

Just pointing out how it looks like from outside the club and the radon why certainly some teams have been thriving since the restart.

The most pleasing aspect about Pulisic is his innate drive to reach new heights...unlike Hazard who constantly goes through the motions, downgrades ambitions, plays within his comfort zone (handbrake on) and content with plateau.

All those downsides to Hazard are reasons I never have and never will be fussed that he left the club.
Young attackers could have picked up on those bad habits, which would have been destructive.

Long may the reasonably good away record (second only to Liverpool) continue

comment by morespurs (U15748)
posted 4 hours, 10 minutes ago
Pulisic was bought a year before the ban to contravene the ban so even during a ban, Chelsea did a transfer and got a player?
Makes a mockery of imposing a ban To a team that has broken a rule previously.
The current 5 subs also is another massive help to the teams that have multiple quality players on the bench.

Just pointing out how it looks like from outside the club and the radon why certainly some teams have been thriving since the restart.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Oh dear...the world according to more$puds

He forgets that they'd lost both Kane & Son prior to the closedown, - conveniently

Tbf to morespurs we absolutely did make a mockery of the transfer ban. Spent 100mil while it was imposed (he forgot Kovacic) and have come out of it in the better position (on the pitch & financially) than going into it. That is quite funny

But on the advantages of the restart yes, if there's one club in the entire league that shouldn't be complaining it's Spurs, it 100% saved their season - yes the rubbish they're serving up right now is saving the season. Before lockdown I honestly couldn't see them winning another game.

He looks like a frightening prospect. With his pace, directness, close control, sharp movements etc he looks like he could put up huge goal numbers in the future. In the same way as wide forwards like Salah, Mane, Sterling etc