or to join or start a new Discussion

5 Comments
Article Rating 4 Stars

Manu's Ban

Was it too short or too long?

Rate 5* for too short, 1* for too long!

posted on 19/5/11

About right I would say

1 week for each of the first 2 punches but that last one was worth a good 4. Less one for a good record = 5 , spot on I say.

Although I am still an advocate of being banned for a number of matches rather than weeks as at the season end it is pretty meaningless.

comment by (U2806)

posted on 19/5/11

I quite agree Nikolas. 5 weeks at this stage of the season means nothing. I don't think it was long enough though. Should have stayed at the maximum. The "provocation" was nowhere near enough to warrent a halving of the ban

posted on 19/5/11

A storm in a tea cup, too much made of it IMHO.

posted on 19/5/11

I feel the way the ban was calculated was wrong- the provocation seems to have been factored in to the initial tariff--10 weeks-- and then halved due to the youth and previous record of Manu--The initial tariff should be higher, I think at ten weeks it sets a bad precedent, and the discount for a youthful first offender should have been higher, leading to a similar result in the end.

posted on 19/5/11

A vile, out of control thug on the football pitch.

A high spirited young chap on the rugger field.

Ho hum

Sign in if you want to comment
RATE THIS ARTICLE
Rate Breakdown
5
0 Votes
4
0 Votes
3
0 Votes
2
0 Votes
1
0 Votes

Average Rating: 4 from 6 votes

ARTICLE STATS
Day
Article RankingNot Ranked
Article ViewsNot Available
Average Time(mins)Not Available
Total Time(mins)Not Available
Month
Article RankingNot Ranked
Article ViewsNot Available
Average Time(mins)Not Available
Total Time(mins)Not Available