The following became very clear:
1. Chamahk and Rosicky should be sold ASAP.
They have nothing to offer and were pretty bad yesterday.
Some fans have mentioned chamahk's workrate last nite. Guys, he's a striker...he's first duty is to score goals. We have a lot of good passers in the team. We really don't need all the needless passes he makes.
He's obviously too scared to shoot or take on players. We should do ourselves a big favour and let him go soon.
Rosicky is slow, tired and quite a useless addition to our squad. Sell him and get another younger, better midfielder. Mr glass-legs will get injured soon so why hold on to him.
2. Frimpong needs to be loaned out ASAP too.
He's still very very raw and needs that invaluable experience/training he ll get in a premiership team in the bottom table ie wolves,bolton.
Remember how such loan spells helped wilshere and song be the players they are today. I hope wenger can loan him out in jan.
We really cannot accomodate an inexperienced player like frimpong in our team now ie we really need to win a trophy soon and I see his mistakes costing us points, plus our present form is not too encouraging he's career doesn't need that now.
3. Finally we have a real 'brazillian' in our team.
No offence,denilson, but you are brazillian only in name.
However, santos is obviously the real deal.
He's skillful, can dribble,can score and defends ok. He too needs a run of games to understand the english game properly.
Imo gibbs should be on the bench for a pretty long time as he's got nothing on santos.
4. Arteta is a decent player no doubt but he's no fabregas.
Hopefully his workrate should be see him through.
Imo he's a slightly better ramsey.
5. Chambo is NOT better than walcott. Last night clearly showed he still has sum way to go before getting to walcott's level, which is not so far off.
P.s. Sagna had a really really awful game last nite. Funny how nobody noted that obvious fact.
After last night's game
posted on 29/9/11
Between okezi and the verminator, it's hard to say whose the more re- tarded.
Actually it's verm because okezi was right about Santos.
posted on 29/9/11
Sagna has not been rested on enough games. Eboue used to cover him much better, but Jenkinson is not ready though Coquelin can play his position.
posted on 29/9/11
Gervinho's fivehead, before calling me re-tarded, tell me what was wrong about my comments. Chamakh has been a moving log for us whenever he has played. Its like playing with 10 men and your blind if you don't realise that. We can't afford to carry passengers in our team, we're under enough pressure as it is.
Maybe rosicky can still be a useful player but certainly he should not be starting.
posted on 29/9/11
Chamakh contributed crucially to both goals off the ball last night. His work rate is phenomenal and needed. Aside from that he played an inch perfect through ball to the ox early in the second half. His distribution is usually quality although sometimes he is over elaborate.
So you see he does bring plenty to us. Your problem is that you can only see the very obvious, and then armed with that, you make articles which I consider re-tarded.
posted on 29/9/11
Has the OP seen anything good yesterday???
I'm not a big fan of Rosicky but I have to admit, if he wasn't him, we would probably not be in the CL right now.
He came as sub against Udiness and did pretty well.
posted on 29/9/11
he still has sum way to go before getting to walcott's level, which is not so far off.
=======
He has some way to go, but isn't far off??
WTF?
posted on 29/9/11
he still has sum way to go before getting to walcott's level, which is not so far off.
and gervinho's forehead, I can only see the very obvious? So you admit that what i have said is obvious, chamakh and rosicky are not good enough to play for arsenal?
Looks like you are the re-tarded one here mate. Im not 'armed' with anything, im just, like you said, pointing out the obvious.
Rosicky had a good game against udinese but that is like 1 in a 100 performances.
Maybe i was being too harsh on him, but that doesn't make me or my opinions re-tarded.
Next time you watch a game, focus purely on the likes of rosicky and how he loses the ball time after time, and picks the wrong options.
Maybe he should only be bought on at half-time because that udinese game was special from him, admittedly. Apart from that game, I don't remember anything decent about him in terms of performances, do you?
posted on 29/9/11
When I say you only see the obvious I don't mean it as a compliment. I mean that you're incapable of seeing the subtle qualities these players bring to our team. I've already glossed over Chamakh's which you duly ignored in your last post. You don't understand why what a player does off the ball is so important? Fine, you know what I think.
Rosicky blows hot and cold but still has the raw talent to change games. It was him who sent Santos free down the left leading to our key 2nd goal. He often produces defence-splitting passes like those. His consistency or lack there of can be frustrating but as pointed out elsewhere, it's hard to be consistent without a platform to gain it first. So are those grounds for getting rid of Rosicky? Hardly.
posted on 29/9/11
Gervinho's fivehead. Fair
I don't know if its just me....but everytime i see rosicky or chamakh in the line-up, i know we will struggle.
I might be completely wrong, but it always happens and there's no getting away from that. You might point to chamakh's and rosicky's defence splitting pass each, but you can't ignore the other bad moments they had.
Chamakh seems to be missing majority of chances and Rosicky seems to be messing up majority of passes. Doesn't mean they can't do something right, just means they aren't doing it consistently enough and at times, they ARE passengers.
posted on 30/9/11
Well said verminator.
P.s. If there's a re-tarded person here its certainly not you.