“Abramovich out”

But what ever his words were, you either empathise with them or you don't!

Empathize with the message but not the reasons behind it in his case. When he's talking about 'idiots on social media' in that article I can't take that & by extension his words seriously cos that's what he's been for years. It's not as if he's a troll, if he was then w/e, he means to be taken seriously.

I remember you posting an article on here recently that mirrored the exact same message right down to having the dig at other fans. While I didn't agree with that aspect, having known you on here for ages I feel you've earned the right to say that cos you're not reactionary at all! In your case I can empathize with the message & the reasons behind it even if I don't 100% agree with you.

comment by BrummieBlue! (U3487)
posted 19 hours, 31 minutes ago
Are you as big a buffoon as you sound Wahl?

You’ve LIED in this article, trying to mislead people into thinking what I’ve said.

1. Show me where I’ve said that I think that author is ‘Wonderful and smart’? I don’t even know who he is!!

2. Show me where in the link, in the article I posted, it mentions anything about wanting to see the back of the best owner of a club any fan could wish for!


You obviously didn’t read the article because it was about the wisdom of appointing a fledgling manager with a view to trying to create a bright future for the club then ditching him at the first sign of adversity and questioning why you would make that appointment in the first place when it should have been obvious that such times like the last few weeks would have been inevitable at some point.

At no point does it advocate getting rid of Roman so how could I be in favour of that?

Everyone has the right to be intellectually challenged Wahl but you abuse that right!

----------------------------------------------------------------------
Chill dude.

You post the opinions of a moron and vouch for them, then you deserve backlash.

Empathize with the message but not the reasons behind it in his case.

----------------------------------------------------------

Are you talking about whatever's in this link or the link in my article?

In the article I linked it only talks about the futility of appointing Lampard in the first place, if we weren't going to give him some latitude in the event of a bad run - nothing more as I read it!!

The link in your article, but the link in this one is proof of why I can't take him seriously in general.

The central argument of sacking Lampard now making his appointment futile I agree with to a point, it's more complicated than that but I can follow it. But shifting the blame onto Abramovich once it's happened, retrospectively criticizing a working model he's been all for when he doesn't like the manager (e.g. Sarri), calling his 200mil+ backing of Frank a 'vanity project' and such, is a typical reactionary response he's prone too.

Anyway, regarding the original question I'm sensing the answer is no

comment by BrummieBlue! (U3487)
posted 3 hours, 45 minutes ago
In regards to Rory, he's an absolute idiot at times with the stuff he says but I think these internet personality's have to be extreme in their views, if not they get no clicks.
-----------------------------------------------------------

He may be an idiot Nick, I have no idea, I've never even heard of him before.

What I do know is that his comments in the article I posted, ref the appointment and subsequent dismissal of Lampard, absolutely resonated with how I felt about it all - it made a mockery of the appointment in the first place!
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Tbf I haven’t read your article, don’t have time for that nonsense (only kidding !)

But no I meant just that whole Roman thing and a few other things, he really comes across as someone trying to sound intelligent when they really are not.
I will give your article to read, however I didn’t mind of franks dismissal as much as some. I wanted end of season, but it wasn’t meant to be.

Like devil I feel we may all be getting our wires crossed. My issue I’m speaking of when it comes to Rory is solely on getting rid of Abramovich.
I haven’t seen his bits on why we initially hire frank and Brum’s article

comment by Devil (U6522)
posted 30 minutes ago
The link in your article, but the link in this one is proof of why I can't take him seriously in general.

The central argument of sacking Lampard now making his appointment futile I agree with to a point, it's more complicated than that but I can follow it. But shifting the blame onto Abramovich once it's happened, retrospectively criticizing a working model he's been all for when he doesn't like the manager (e.g. Sarri), calling his 200mil+ backing of Frank a 'vanity project' and such, is a typical reactionary response he's prone too.

Anyway, regarding the original question I'm sensing the answer is no
----------------------------------------------------------------------

I haven't read the link in this article so I can't help you I'm afraid!

What was the question by the way!!!

Not important, I assumed you'd watched the clip

Nah, I gathered it would just be some anti Chelsea rhetoric just to wind Chelsea supporters up given the OPs MO so just gave it a miss!