Player who is contracted to the club comes on as a substitute.
Thought we looked better with Kane up top.
He could at least hold the ball up. Had a few nice touches.
Not bad for a player who only recently started training.
Hope he stays.
The headline is?
posted on 22/8/21
comment by Troy'sTanguyTanganga (U6468)
posted 6 minutes ago
Heard he applauded the fans and headbutted Nuno
----------------------------------------------------------------------
posted on 22/8/21
posted on 22/8/21
Not going anywhere.
Will start our next two games and bag at least 4
posted on 22/8/21
posted on 22/8/21
comment by Phenom (U20037)
posted 26 seconds ago
Not going anywhere.
Will start our next two games and bag at least 4
----------------------------------------------------------------------
posted on 22/8/21
Maybe one more year of Kane is a good thing, even compared to getting top money this summer. Us fans won't see a penny of any transfer fee and given our track record of squandering money it may be for the best. Parrott and Scarlett might even be ready in a year's time
posted on 22/8/21
comment by Brother (U20548)
posted 36 minutes ago
Maybe one more year of Kane is a good thing, even compared to getting top money this summer. Us fans won't see a penny of any transfer fee and given our track record of squandering money it may be for the best. Parrott and Scarlett might even be ready in a year's time
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Maybe?? It's imperative. We have few goal scorers anyone at this stage would be a huge gamble
posted on 22/8/21
comment by Ioavirgo (U10470)
posted 1 hour, 45 minutes ago
comment by Brother (U20548)
posted 36 minutes ago
Maybe one more year of Kane is a good thing, even compared to getting top money this summer. Us fans won't see a penny of any transfer fee and given our track record of squandering money it may be for the best. Parrott and Scarlett might even be ready in a year's time
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Maybe?? It's imperative. We have few goal scorers anyone at this stage would be a huge gamble
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I mean in terms of the long term future of the club really. Some would argue that selling him for say £160m this summer is better than keeping him for a season and then selling him for, say, £90m.
posted on 22/8/21
comment by Brother (U20548)
posted 36 minutes ago
comment by Ioavirgo (U10470)
posted 1 hour, 45 minutes ago
comment by Brother (U20548)
posted 36 minutes ago
Maybe one more year of Kane is a good thing, even compared to getting top money this summer. Us fans won't see a penny of any transfer fee and given our track record of squandering money it may be for the best. Parrott and Scarlett might even be ready in a year's time
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Maybe?? It's imperative. We have few goal scorers anyone at this stage would be a huge gamble
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I mean in terms of the long term future of the club really. Some would argue that selling him for say £160m this summer is better than keeping him for a season and then selling him for, say, £90m.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Depends what we do with it, if we absolutely guaranteed getting Martinez and/or Valhovic(however it's spelt) plus a creative midfielder and a RB as a minimum, it's worth it.
If that's not nailed on, then selling Kane now is counter-productive for the sake of maybe £60m
posted on 22/8/21
Sorry, but I was about to say the headline is "Lukaku is the second coming"
I am sure that is the case given Sky's refusal to discuss anything else from start to finish. And in a way that they really think we all care what he does.