More fans than City get in a CL Match?

comment by NPE - Finding Timo (U22712)
posted 8 minutes ago
comment by Boris 'Inky’ Gibson (U5901)
posted 1 hour, 26 minutes ago
After the embarrassment of not selling all your tickets for the Champions League Final, it seems the rot is setting in:-

Chelsea v Malmo - Attendance - 39,813

City v Club Brugge - Attendance - 50,288

----------------------------------------------------------------------


50,288 = 91.3% turnout at the Etihad

39,913 = 95.2% turnout at Stamford Bridge



Maybe check up some basic facts before you dunk
----------------------------------------------------------------------
The capacity for league games at the Etihad is 52,300,substantially less for European games because of UEFA rulings.

Where do you get 91.3% from?

Yeah we hold the PL record for attendance but I think most level headed spurs fans could admit we aren’t the best supported team in the PL

P.S at our ticket prices those extra 2,062 seats is an extra £200k for the club

comment by Edinspur (U1109)
posted 1 minute ago
Yeah we hold the PL record for attendance but I think most level headed spurs fans could admit we aren’t the best supported team in the PL

P.S at our ticket prices those extra 2,062 seats is an extra £200k for the club
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Hmm...that's not to be sniffed at.

With Chelsea - I am must not sure the £1bn plus it will cost to upgrade Stamford Bridge is worth the 18,000 extra seats, especially when we probably wouldn't tolerate the decade or so of necessary penny pinching afterwards which will reduce our ability to compete for titles consistently

comment by NPE - Finding Timo (U22712)
posted 1 hour, 41 minutes ago
comment by Edinspur (U1109)
posted 1 minute ago
Yeah we hold the PL record for attendance but I think most level headed spurs fans could admit we aren’t the best supported team in the PL

P.S at our ticket prices those extra 2,062 seats is an extra £200k for the club
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Hmm...that's not to be sniffed at.

With Chelsea - I am must not sure the £1bn plus it will cost to upgrade Stamford Bridge is worth the 18,000 extra seats, especially when we probably wouldn't tolerate the decade or so of necessary penny pinching afterwards which will reduce our ability to compete for titles consistently
----------------------------------------------------------------------
When I were a lad, 18k at the Bridge in Div 2 was champion.

comment by Boris 'Inky’ Gibson (U5901)
posted 2 hours, 3 minutes ago
comment by NPE - Finding Timo (U22712)
posted 8 minutes ago
comment by Boris 'Inky’ Gibson (U5901)
posted 1 hour, 26 minutes ago
After the embarrassment of not selling all your tickets for the Champions League Final, it seems the rot is setting in:-

Chelsea v Malmo - Attendance - 39,813

City v Club Brugge - Attendance - 50,288

----------------------------------------------------------------------


50,288 = 91.3% turnout at the Etihad

39,913 = 95.2% turnout at Stamford Bridge



Maybe check up some basic facts before you dunk
----------------------------------------------------------------------
The capacity for league games at the Etihad is 52,300,substantially less for European games because of UEFA rulings.

Where do you get 91.3% from?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
How funny that you point to uefa rulings totally ignoring that that’s the reason why chelsea only had 39,913 for the Malmö game. That’s our capacity for those games . You bloody plonker. And chelsea sold all their tickets for the cl final. That myth was debunked

comment by NPE - Finding Timo (U22712)
posted 2 hours, 37 minutes ago
That's a bit rich considering how much Spurs have been rubbing it in with their new stadium - and how it is 2,062 seats more than the Emirates

No offence, I know you're a very level headed football fan who probably didn't do those shenanigans
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It's more seats when the real owners the NFL use it

comment by Nickasaurus (U9257)
posted 26 minutes ago
comment by Boris 'Inky’ Gibson (U5901)
posted 2 hours, 3 minutes ago
comment by NPE - Finding Timo (U22712)
posted 8 minutes ago
comment by Boris 'Inky’ Gibson (U5901)
posted 1 hour, 26 minutes ago
After the embarrassment of not selling all your tickets for the Champions League Final, it seems the rot is setting in:-

Chelsea v Malmo - Attendance - 39,813

City v Club Brugge - Attendance - 50,288

----------------------------------------------------------------------


50,288 = 91.3% turnout at the Etihad

39,913 = 95.2% turnout at Stamford Bridge



Maybe check up some basic facts before you dunk
----------------------------------------------------------------------
The capacity for league games at the Etihad is 52,300,substantially less for European games because of UEFA rulings.

Where do you get 91.3% from?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
How funny that you point to uefa rulings totally ignoring that that’s the reason why chelsea only had 39,913 for the Malmö game. That’s our capacity for those games . You bloody plonker. And chelsea sold all their tickets for the cl final. That myth was debunked
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I didn't need to say anything about your capacity being decreased by UEFA, I was just pointing out that we had 14,000 more fans at our last CL game than you did.

It's the OP who seems to think we get 12,000 for our European games, I'm simply correcting the thickcunt.

comment by Boris 'Inky’ Gibson (U5901)
posted 2 days, 13 hours ago
comment by Nickasaurus (U9257)
posted 26 minutes ago
comment by Boris 'Inky’ Gibson (U5901)
posted 2 hours, 3 minutes ago
comment by NPE - Finding Timo (U22712)
posted 8 minutes ago
comment by Boris 'Inky’ Gibson (U5901)
posted 1 hour, 26 minutes ago
After the embarrassment of not selling all your tickets for the Champions League Final, it seems the rot is setting in:-

Chelsea v Malmo - Attendance - 39,813

City v Club Brugge - Attendance - 50,288

----------------------------------------------------------------------


50,288 = 91.3% turnout at the Etihad

39,913 = 95.2% turnout at Stamford Bridge



Maybe check up some basic facts before you dunk
----------------------------------------------------------------------
The capacity for league games at the Etihad is 52,300,substantially less for European games because of UEFA rulings.

Where do you get 91.3% from?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
How funny that you point to uefa rulings totally ignoring that that’s the reason why chelsea only had 39,913 for the Malmö game. That’s our capacity for those games . You bloody plonker. And chelsea sold all their tickets for the cl final. That myth was debunked
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I didn't need to say anything about your capacity being decreased by UEFA, I was just pointing out that we had 14,000 more fans at our last CL game than you did.

It's the OP who seems to think we get 12,000 for our European games, I'm simply correcting the thickcunt.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Oh, was he being serious? Looked like a total wind up to me.

comment by JFDI (U1657)
posted 33 minutes ago
comment by Boris 'Inky’ Gibson (U5901)
posted 2 days, 13 hours ago
comment by Nickasaurus (U9257)
posted 26 minutes ago
comment by Boris 'Inky’ Gibson (U5901)
posted 2 hours, 3 minutes ago
comment by NPE - Finding Timo (U22712)
posted 8 minutes ago
comment by Boris 'Inky’ Gibson (U5901)
posted 1 hour, 26 minutes ago
After the embarrassment of not selling all your tickets for the Champions League Final, it seems the rot is setting in:-

Chelsea v Malmo - Attendance - 39,813

City v Club Brugge - Attendance - 50,288

----------------------------------------------------------------------


50,288 = 91.3% turnout at the Etihad

39,913 = 95.2% turnout at Stamford Bridge



Maybe check up some basic facts before you dunk
----------------------------------------------------------------------
The capacity for league games at the Etihad is 52,300,substantially less for European games because of UEFA rulings.

Where do you get 91.3% from?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
How funny that you point to uefa rulings totally ignoring that that’s the reason why chelsea only had 39,913 for the Malmö game. That’s our capacity for those games . You bloody plonker. And chelsea sold all their tickets for the cl final. That myth was debunked
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I didn't need to say anything about your capacity being decreased by UEFA, I was just pointing out that we had 14,000 more fans at our last CL game than you did.

It's the OP who seems to think we get 12,000 for our European games, I'm simply correcting the thickcunt.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Oh, was he being serious? Looked like a total wind up to me.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Why not chose a team that gets lower attendances than Chelsea then?

comment by Boris 'Inky’ Gibson (U5901)
posted 1 day, 12 hours ago
comment by JFDI (U1657)
posted 33 minutes ago
comment by Boris 'Inky’ Gibson (U5901)
posted 2 days, 13 hours ago
comment by Nickasaurus (U9257)
posted 26 minutes ago
comment by Boris 'Inky’ Gibson (U5901)
posted 2 hours, 3 minutes ago
comment by NPE - Finding Timo (U22712)
posted 8 minutes ago
comment by Boris 'Inky’ Gibson (U5901)
posted 1 hour, 26 minutes ago
After the embarrassment of not selling all your tickets for the Champions League Final, it seems the rot is setting in:-

Chelsea v Malmo - Attendance - 39,813

City v Club Brugge - Attendance - 50,288

----------------------------------------------------------------------


50,288 = 91.3% turnout at the Etihad

39,913 = 95.2% turnout at Stamford Bridge



Maybe check up some basic facts before you dunk
----------------------------------------------------------------------
The capacity for league games at the Etihad is 52,300,substantially less for European games because of UEFA rulings.

Where do you get 91.3% from?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
How funny that you point to uefa rulings totally ignoring that that’s the reason why chelsea only had 39,913 for the Malmö game. That’s our capacity for those games . You bloody plonker. And chelsea sold all their tickets for the cl final. That myth was debunked
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I didn't need to say anything about your capacity being decreased by UEFA, I was just pointing out that we had 14,000 more fans at our last CL game than you did.

It's the OP who seems to think we get 12,000 for our European games, I'm simply correcting the thickcunt.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Oh, was he being serious? Looked like a total wind up to me.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Why not chose a team that gets lower attendances than Chelsea then?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I think the responses answer that.