or to join or start a new Discussion

66 Comments
Article Rating 4.43 Stars

The myth some spurs fans have of

Being better than us before Roman. Can we end this false myth?

Spurs were absolute trash before Roman took us over, since Roman took us over they’ve become regulars in the top 6, before Roman they was struggling to even make the top 10 consistently and regularly below us

Why do spurs fans constantly try and pretend they were better than us pre Roman? deluded mugs

Spurs PL pre Roman in order

8th - Chelsea 11th
15th - Chelsea 14th
7th - Chelsea 11th
8th - Chelsea 11th
10th - Chelsea 6th
14th - Chelsea 4th
11th - Chelsea 3rd
10th - Chelsea 5th
12th - Chelsea 6th
9th - Chelsea 6th
10th - Chelsea 4th

Since Roman in order

14th - Chelsea 2nd
9th - Chelsea 1st
5th - Chelsea 1st
5th - Chelsea 2nd
11th - Chelsea 2nd
8th - Chelsea 3rd
4th - Chelsea 1st
5th - Chelsea 2nd
4th - Chelsea 6th
5th - Chelsea 3rd
6th - Chelsea 3rd
5th - Chelsea 1st
3rd - Chelsea 10th
2nd - Chelsea 1st
3rd - Chelsea 5th
4th - Chelsea 3rd
6th - Chelsea 4th
7th - Chelsea 4th

So if anything Roman taking over Chelsea massively benefited Spurs. So the question is will Spurs go back to being trash and a mid table club now Roman is leaving? Judging by this season more than likely

posted on 14/3/22

Afternoon Palmers, nice to have hf and yourself to bring a bit of sanity to proceedings!

posted on 14/3/22

Afternoon Hounslow / Brummie

Hope you are both well

I’m Spurs obvs but at the same time I like to think I can argue objectively !

comment by Bov (U6696)

posted on 14/3/22

comment by PawlBawron (U1055)
posted 5 hours, 45 minutes ago
The first thing Roman did was write a cheque for 80mil to keep Chelsea out of administration so I think it's safe to say that the money required to buy the players needed to win the trophies that were being won in the years leading up to his takeover was bankrupting them.

Had he not stepped in when he did they would have done a Portsmouth/Leeds. Even then they were being run as if they were a rich man's play thing but at that point they didn't have the rich man.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You think RA was the only bidder for Chelsea back then ? Right now Chelsea are said to have 200 interested parties wanting to purchase them. There are 5 or 6 very credible potential owners in there. Chelsea will never be short of buyers due to our history and location. Comparing us with Portsmouth is chalk and cheese.

posted on 14/3/22

OP, you decided to mention league positions what about TROPHIES??

Trophies something you mention whenever you talk Spurs, so tell us how many Trophies did Chelsea win pre-RA?

posted on 14/3/22

comment by morespurs (U15748)
posted 1 minute ago
OP, you decided to mention league positions what about TROPHIES??

Trophies something you mention whenever you talk Spurs, so tell us how many Trophies did Chelsea win pre-RA?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
i think 13. it might be a dodgy site.

posted on 14/3/22

comment by palmers_spur (U8896)
posted 3 hours, 6 minutes ago
comment by hounslows-finest (U6180)
posted 49 minutes ago
comment by Oscar. #TeamFury. (U12980)
posted 3 hours, 22 minutes ago
Didn’t spurs’ dodgy heavy handed rich owners send their cronies to try and force small businesses out so they could build the new stadium? Including death threats and arson attacks, especially on one steel company in particular??
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yes Daniel Levy was seen torching Archway Steel Ltd

I’m still shocked how he got away with it.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Oscar chats a lot of shiiit tbf

The other day he likened Andrex supplying toilet paper to the Russian army to Abramovich manufacturing tanks for them (which might be untrue but the analogy is still completely ridiculous)



----------------------------------------------------------------------
A steel company Roman has a 29% stake in it’s such a weak argument it deserves to be compared to toilet roll because it’s full of $hit

posted on 14/3/22

comment by morespurs (U15748)
posted 2 hours, 14 minutes ago
OP, you decided to mention league positions what about TROPHIES??

Trophies something you mention whenever you talk Spurs, so tell us how many Trophies did Chelsea win pre-RA?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Couldn’t work spurs trophy count out, too much dust didn’t fancy breathing it in

posted on 15/3/22

comment by Oscar. #TeamFury. (U12980)
posted 23 hours, 8 minutes ago
comment by morespurs (U15748)
posted 2 hours, 14 minutes ago
OP, you decided to mention league positions what about TROPHIES??

Trophies something you mention whenever you talk Spurs, so tell us how many Trophies did Chelsea win pre-RA?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Couldn’t work spurs trophy count out, too much dust didn’t fancy breathing it in
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Can only breath in your trophy cabinet and it smells of blood

Corrupt club owned by a most corrupt!

Just give up this charade and hand over those "stolen" trophies

posted on 16/3/22

comment by Bov (U6696)
posted 2 days, 3 hours ago
comment by PawlBawron (U1055)
posted 5 hours, 45 minutes ago
The first thing Roman did was write a cheque for 80mil to keep Chelsea out of administration so I think it's safe to say that the money required to buy the players needed to win the trophies that were being won in the years leading up to his takeover was bankrupting them.

Had he not stepped in when he did they would have done a Portsmouth/Leeds. Even then they were being run as if they were a rich man's play thing but at that point they didn't have the rich man.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You think RA was the only bidder for Chelsea back then ? Right now Chelsea are said to have 200 interested parties wanting to purchase them. There are 5 or 6 very credible potential owners in there. Chelsea will never be short of buyers due to our history and location. Comparing us with Portsmouth is chalk and cheese.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Well said Bov, it’s a lazy, biased assertion. Chelsea will always score heavily over location when compared to Spurs. I for one am not remotely surprised that there are so many different interested parties from all parts of the Globe wanting to buy us, I would have been more surprised if there wasn’t tbh.

comment by Cloggy (U1250)

posted on 17/3/22

comment by sandy, golden boot winner fa cup 1901 (U20567)
posted 2 days, 18 hours ago
comment by bestoftherest2021 (U22523)
posted 1 hour ago
Haaaa Sandy saying Chelsea were borrowing money... where'd you think they money for your egg bowl stadium came from?? a fairy godmother??
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Difference is Spurs can pay their borrowed money back, and it has gone into an investment, a new stadium. Chelsea borrowed money to try to win a couple of trophies. Chelsea had to go out with the begging bowl, because they had no way of paying it back, and would have gone under, had the blood money not arrived in the nick of time.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It's not blood money moron

Sign in if you want to comment
RATE THIS ARTICLE
Rate Breakdown
5
0 Votes
4
0 Votes
3
0 Votes
2
0 Votes
1
0 Votes

Average Rating: 4.43 from 7 votes

ARTICLE STATS
Day
Article RankingNot Ranked
Article ViewsNot Available
Average Time(mins)Not Available
Total Time(mins)Not Available
Month
Article RankingNot Ranked
Article ViewsNot Available
Average Time(mins)Not Available
Total Time(mins)Not Available