Sponsors

Going against the sponsors on your shirts, under the circumstances and the banning on any trading coming in or out off your club, unless you have any shirts without the adverts within the club would you be able to get new shirts to replace those being used?..

There must be a reason why you're still wearing the shirts you are and I'd think the banning order plays a big part!..

Roman being sanctioned doesn't free Chelsea from their obligations you genius.

Sanctions are supposed to hurt, not help you by relieving you of your financial obligations.

Surely if it’s just a transfer then the players could peel the sponsors off pre kick off

comment by Assassin Baby - (U1282)
posted 5 hours, 48 minutes ago
Roman being sanctioned doesn't free Chelsea from their obligations you genius.

Sanctions are supposed to hurt, not help you by relieving you of your financial obligations.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Is it Chelsea that were sanctioned then?

comment by tcw (U6489)
posted 42 minutes ago
comment by Assassin Baby - (U1282)
posted 5 hours, 48 minutes ago
Roman being sanctioned doesn't free Chelsea from their obligations you genius.

Sanctions are supposed to hurt, not help you by relieving you of your financial obligations.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Is it Chelsea that were sanctioned then?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
youd think so by the bs spouted in here but as long as no money changes hands then getting shirts donated from Nike should be ok

comment by tcw (U6489)
posted 6 hours, 8 minutes ago
comment by Assassin Baby - (U1282)
posted 5 hours, 48 minutes ago
Roman being sanctioned doesn't free Chelsea from their obligations you genius.

Sanctions are supposed to hurt, not help you by relieving you of your financial obligations.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Is it Chelsea that were sanctioned then?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Chelsea owned by a guy under sanctions means Chelsea are relieved of financial obligations. Genius.

comment by Assassin Baby - (U1282)
posted 5 hours, 9 minutes ago
comment by tcw (U6489)
posted 6 hours, 8 minutes ago
comment by Assassin Baby - (U1282)
posted 5 hours, 48 minutes ago
Roman being sanctioned doesn't free Chelsea from their obligations you genius.

Sanctions are supposed to hurt, not help you by relieving you of your financial obligations.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Is it Chelsea that were sanctioned then?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Chelsea owned by a guy under sanctions means Chelsea are relieved of financial obligations. Genius.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Sure we would love to pay if we hadn't been temporarily frozen

Not sure what we haven't paid for that has generated this discussion anyway

Chelsea fans’ anger should be directed towards your (former) owner. He’s the one who got you in this situation. It’s not the sponsors fault they don’t want to be associated with the club and Roman by proxy.

comment by tcw (U6489)
posted 22 minutes ago
Not sure what we haven't paid for that has generated this discussion anyway
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Me neither.