Worst kept secret official...

https://www.mancity.com/news/mens/club-statement-erling-haaland-63787789

It was crystal clear since a few weeks now

Been obvious for years, just have to listen to what his dad has said. Always wanted City, was whether or not they wanted him.

Would they have gone for him if they got Kane?

They could have got 3/4 of a Lukaku instead

comment by HB Fash (U21935)
posted 57 minutes ago
They could have got 3/4 of a Lukaku instead
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Chelsea thought they were getting 3/4 of the current "sturdy" Lukaku tbf

Time for us to respond by signing Kane and Son from London’s 4th top team

The only weigh a uther EPL team cud compeat with the Man Cs is if one of em sighen Osimhen 4 >€100m

Its the only whey

comment by #4zA - 🇮🇹🇺🇦 no al calcio moderno (U22472)
The only weigh a uther EPL team cud compeat with the Man Cs is if one of em sighen Osimhen 4 >€100m

Its the only whey
----------------------------------------------------------------------

https://video.twimg.com/ext_tw_video/1522293126110621701/pu/vid/1280x720/8kwZQ6jw1_A7K26p.mp4

Tornare a casa

comment by InBefore (U20589)
Would they have gone for him if they got Kane?
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Signing Kane was an impossible task, knowing who they have to deal with and contract length.
City realistically knew they were never going to meet the exorbitant demands for Kane.
They were simply probing.

Haaland was always the goal.
Which makes sense...being 7 years his junior and long-term.
Haaland being very young (basically still a baby) and already accomplished at European elite level will make it so much easier for Pep to mould him into an even more formidable machine.