Which club worry you

comment by Devonshirespur (U6316)
posted 9 hours, 14 minutes ago
jeez, Liverpool fans and their Net Spend drum they keep banging...its more irritating than a listing to a vuvuzela
----------------------------------------------------------------------
From a spurs fan ii thought you lot were the proud net spend champions

comment by Boris 'Inky’ Gibson (U5901)
posted 9 hours, 40 minutes ago
comment by Assassin Baby - (U1282)
posted 4 hours, 4 minutes ago
comment by FootyMcfootfoot (U21853)
posted 3 hours, 35 minutes ago
comment by Boris 'Inky’ Gibson (U5901)
posted 1 hour, 35 minutes ago
comment by Wahl Koulibaly … Kalidou > Virgil (U22857)
posted 43 minutes ago
Liverpool just spent 100m on an unproven striker whereas city spent less for haaland. Liverpool spend more money than anyone these days
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Liverpool still spending the £4.8bn they got for Coutinho
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Peps spent that just on lb''s and cb''s 😂😂😂
----------------------------------------------------------------------
We didn't spend 100m on a striker, and City still spent more on Haaland than we did on Nunez.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
That is just a barefaced lie.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
How so?

comment by Pranks - Going for the JA LFC FF 3peat (U22336)
posted 24 minutes ago
comment by Devonshirespur (U6316)
posted 9 hours, 14 minutes ago
jeez, Liverpool fans and their Net Spend drum they keep banging...its more irritating than a listing to a vuvuzela
----------------------------------------------------------------------
From a spurs fanii thought you lot were the proud net spend champions
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Naah, Liverpool are still the net spend champs.

comment by Devonshirespur (U6316)
posted 10 hours, 5 minutes ago
comment by Nickasaurus (U9257)
posted 11 hours, 39 minutes ago
Chelsea would hand finished a lot higher than spurs if not for key injuries last year. With all teams fit chelsea will be much a bigger threat than utd and arsenal. It’s all moot though. Signings to be made and who cares unless we’re challenging for silverware
----------------------------------------------------------------------
We out performed you from Dec to May with an inferior squad. You cannot blame injuries too much, your squad is massive and your manager takes some blame for not making things work.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Of course I can blame injuries. I don’t rate the replacements.

comment by Nickasaurus (U9257)
posted 58 seconds ago
comment by Devonshirespur (U6316)
posted 10 hours, 5 minutes ago
comment by Nickasaurus (U9257)
posted 11 hours, 39 minutes ago
Chelsea would hand finished a lot higher than spurs if not for key injuries last year. With all teams fit chelsea will be much a bigger threat than utd and arsenal. It’s all moot though. Signings to be made and who cares unless we’re challenging for silverware
----------------------------------------------------------------------
We out performed you from Dec to May with an inferior squad. You cannot blame injuries too much, your squad is massive and your manager takes some blame for not making things work.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Of course I can blame injuries. I don’t rate the replacements.
--------------------------------------------------------------------
Spurs only managed to finish ahead of United and Arsenal because they had no European football. Spurs bottled and chickened out of the conference league. They were struggling badly with European commitments and are now in the Champions League. Doesn't bode well.

Well currently you don't have starters let alone upgraded the replacements....and it's a long season so you have to expect injuries and have to rely on the squad. Its hardly an excuse when the squad is so expensively assembled and these issues you perceived are not addressed.

comment by Assassin Baby - (U1282)
posted 7 minutes ago
comment by Nickasaurus (U9257)
posted 58 seconds ago
comment by Devonshirespur (U6316)
posted 10 hours, 5 minutes ago
comment by Nickasaurus (U9257)
posted 11 hours, 39 minutes ago
Chelsea would hand finished a lot higher than spurs if not for key injuries last year. With all teams fit chelsea will be much a bigger threat than utd and arsenal. It’s all moot though. Signings to be made and who cares unless we’re challenging for silverware
----------------------------------------------------------------------
We out performed you from Dec to May with an inferior squad. You cannot blame injuries too much, your squad is massive and your manager takes some blame for not making things work.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Of course I can blame injuries. I don’t rate the replacements.
--------------------------------------------------------------------
Spurs only managed to finish ahead of United and Arsenal because they had no European football. Spurs bottled and chickened out of the conference league. They were struggling badly with European commitments and are now in the Champions League. Doesn't bode well.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Arsenal didn't have any European football. Nice try though.

History tells you that playing in the CL serves you better in the league than playing in the Europa.

comment by Devonshirespur (U6316)
posted 4 hours, 19 minutes ago
Well currently you don't have starters let alone upgraded the replacements....and it's a long season so you have to expect injuries and have to rely on the squad. Its hardly an excuse when the squad is so expensively assembled and these issues you perceived are not addressed.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Not sure what you are confused about. If not for injuries to key players chelsea would have finished a lot further ahead of spurs. It’s not a crazy thing to say. Money spent on squad or not. If spurs lost Kane and son they’d suffer

comment by Devonshirespur (U6316)
posted 16 hours, 5 minutes ago
jeez, Liverpool fans and their Net Spend drum they keep banging...its more irritating than a listing to a vuvuzela
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You're bound to say that. Spurs have spanked more cash than Liverpool in recent seasons and achieved nothing😂

Spending a fraction of what city spend, and being able to compete with them is something spurs are striving to do, unless you have pep billions to spend? Engage your brain just for once 😂 you are mocking exactly what u hope to mimic.

Run a club properly and invest well and you can win trophies. Net spend is one of the most important things to running a successful business, and that's what all teams that aren't funded by oil $ are.

comment by Spurtle (U1608)
posted 19 hours, 49 minutes ago
comment by Assassin Baby - (U1282)
posted 7 minutes ago
comment by Nickasaurus (U9257)
posted 58 seconds ago
comment by Devonshirespur (U6316)
posted 10 hours, 5 minutes ago
comment by Nickasaurus (U9257)
posted 11 hours, 39 minutes ago
Chelsea would hand finished a lot higher than spurs if not for key injuries last year. With all teams fit chelsea will be much a bigger threat than utd and arsenal. It’s all moot though. Signings to be made and who cares unless we’re challenging for silverware
----------------------------------------------------------------------
We out performed you from Dec to May with an inferior squad. You cannot blame injuries too much, your squad is massive and your manager takes some blame for not making things work.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Of course I can blame injuries. I don’t rate the replacements.
--------------------------------------------------------------------
Spurs only managed to finish ahead of United and Arsenal because they had no European football. Spurs bottled and chickened out of the conference league. They were struggling badly with European commitments and are now in the Champions League. Doesn't bode well.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Arsenal didn't have any European football. Nice try though.

History tells you that playing in the CL serves you better in the league than playing in the Europa.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Fair enough that was inaccurate.

Nevertheless, Spurs still only got away from Arsenal, and United in the last few games of the season, especially Arsenal. The gap between the teams was small at the end of last season. Obviously this coming season is unpredictable with all the big moves that have happened. Everyone wondering whether or how many of their signings will click or flop. Should be a great season.