Haaland

comment by Edbo (U17933)
posted 12 minutes ago
comment by Abiggidybiggidybong (U5313)
posted 4 hours, 53 minutes ago
His second goal summed him up perfectly; as Foden's lining up his shot, Haaland drifts away from the defenders and anticipates the rebound, so when it comes out to him he's in yards of space for what looks like a tap in.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

The defending for that goal was absolutely shambolic. In fact their defending was shambolic all night.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
He's done this at every club and the country he represents. The defending isn't constantly shambolic, the bloke is just too good with his movement

comment by DejaVu Wolf (U22884)
posted 18 hours, 35 minutes ago
Been reading thoughts on another thread that he's not as good as Flatrack Kane?
----------------------------------------------------------------------

God you’re a melt, did Kane shaasg your missus ?

Al as o didn’t you say that Jimenez was better than Kane ?

comment by palmers_spur (U8896)
posted 21 minutes ago
comment by DejaVu Wolf (U22884)
posted 18 hours, 35 minutes ago
Been reading thoughts on another thread that he's not as good as Flatrack Kane?
----------------------------------------------------------------------

God you’re a melt, did Kane shaasg your missus ?

Al as o didn’t you say that Jimenez was better than Kane ?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
There has been a noticeable trend of Spurs supporters getting weirdly dismissive of Haaland/defensive over Kane whenever Haaland is mentioned in a particularly positive light.

If anything Spurs fans should be buzzing, it means City have no reason to chase/unsettle Kane now they've managed to sign a superior striker

There is not a club on the planet that would take Kane over Haaland. FACT!!

comment by Cinciwolf---throwing money around like confetti (U11551)
posted 1 hour, 9 minutes ago
There is not a club on the planet that would take Kane over Haaland. FACT!!
----------------------------------------------------------------------
To be fair, Kane still definitely offers some things Haaland currently doesn't but Haaland is also miles ahead of Kane in other areas and has his whole career practically ahead of him

Haaland is still missing the Millwall Young Player of the Year accolade.

comment by Two Balls, One Saka (U19684)
posted 7 hours, 57 minutes ago
comment by palmers_spur (U8896)
posted 21 minutes ago
comment by DejaVu Wolf (U22884)
posted 18 hours, 35 minutes ago
Been reading thoughts on another thread that he's not as good as Flatrack Kane?
----------------------------------------------------------------------

God you’re a melt, did Kane shaasg your missus ?

Al as o didn’t you say that Jimenez was better than Kane ?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
There has been a noticeable trend of Spurs supporters getting weirdly dismissive of Haaland/defensive over Kane whenever Haaland is mentioned in a particularly positive light.

If anything Spurs fans should be buzzing, it means City have no reason to chase/unsettle Kane now they've managed to sign a superior striker
----------------------------------------------------------------------

I’m not aware of any who dismissed Haaland but fair enough if there were. I remember the debate earlier in the year and it was possibly on the basis that Haaland was playing in a weaker league at the time. He certainly is class although his goal return is still too small a sample size to tell how good he is or will be.

I just find this Wolves fan’s obsession with Spurs and Kane to be really weird.

Rent free!!

You wish

Wishes do come true!!