Martial

comment by Elvis (U7425)
posted 36 seconds ago
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 7 minutes ago
comment by Elvis (U7425)
posted 13 seconds ago
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 3 minutes ago
The only reason this has gone this way is because the pair of you jumped in to have a go at me when the exchange I had, had nothing to do with you.

Read back… it’s very clear.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

It went this way because, as per, you started being a d!ck in what was a reasonable discussion. You started insulting people's intelligence, did your usual trick of confusing what people were actually discussing, then played the victim card. It is your MO. And if you genuinely aren't aware that you do that time after time after time, then you probably need to seek some help.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Nope.

That’s just a lie.

All I did was respond to someone who’d written chapter and verse to prove that it’s overly simplistic to say the scouts need to get off their backside… with a ‘well obviously’ comment.

That was it. It was nothing.

And then you piled in, threw a massive tantrum and wondered why you got some back.

You also decided to try and pick holes in my point and then, when you realised I can easily reject those points with logic, you made it personal.

Embarrassing and I expect better from you, tbh.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Make it personal? Dear lord, you have no lack of self-awareness. You insulted another poster's intelligence, then started playing the victim card when you get some stick back. Same old Winston. Never your fault. You made a tw@t of yourself over some perceived slight that wasn't even intended.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

What post did I write that meant you felt the need to jump in and insult me?

Please do explain what justification you have for your behaviour and why I’m the reason you can’t control yourself.

comment by Elvis (U7425)
posted 33 seconds ago
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 5 minutes ago
It’s cute when people have to stick in packs on this forum.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Even cuter when you can't admit your got it wrong. Again.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

I often admit I’m wrong on here. More than anyone else I’ve seen.

I’m not wrong here.

You are.

There’s no packs. There’s you, and everyone else on the sight that can see how you behave.

*site

comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 39 seconds ago
It’s not irrelevant, Elvis, because it speaks to whether the scouts were being ignored or not.

All those quotes do is give very, very limited evidence that management weren’t always listening to scouts about 7 years ago.

That has absolutely nothing to do with my point and question about whether there’s any evidence of the scouts doing a good job in the context of recent years.

You’re hanging onto the semantics of ‘far fetched and lacking credibility’ because you can’t debate my actual point.

I stand by those comments and could easily explain why, but frankly they’re largely irrelevant to the point I was making.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

I mean, I've explained it to you at least 3 times now. Pointless trying again. You're in full denial mode at this point.

comment by Elvis (U7425)
posted 17 seconds ago
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 39 seconds ago
It’s not irrelevant, Elvis, because it speaks to whether the scouts were being ignored or not.

All those quotes do is give very, very limited evidence that management weren’t always listening to scouts about 7 years ago.

That has absolutely nothing to do with my point and question about whether there’s any evidence of the scouts doing a good job in the context of recent years.

You’re hanging onto the semantics of ‘far fetched and lacking credibility’ because you can’t debate my actual point.

I stand by those comments and could easily explain why, but frankly they’re largely irrelevant to the point I was making.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

I mean, I've explained it to you at least 3 times now. Pointless trying again. You're in full denial mode at this point.


----------------------------------------------------------------------

You’ve made a point and I’ve rebuffed it.

I can only assume you’re throwing a huge tantrum because you don’t like the fact that I’ve ruined your point.

comment by Lisandro The King Martinez (U10026)
posted 1 minute ago
There’s no packs. There’s you, and everyone else on the sight that can see how you behave.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Oh there’s packs alright.

100%.

comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Elvis (U7425)
posted 36 seconds ago
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 7 minutes ago
comment by Elvis (U7425)
posted 13 seconds ago
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 3 minutes ago
The only reason this has gone this way is because the pair of you jumped in to have a go at me when the exchange I had, had nothing to do with you.

Read back… it’s very clear.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

It went this way because, as per, you started being a d!ck in what was a reasonable discussion. You started insulting people's intelligence, did your usual trick of confusing what people were actually discussing, then played the victim card. It is your MO. And if you genuinely aren't aware that you do that time after time after time, then you probably need to seek some help.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Nope.

That’s just a lie.

All I did was respond to someone who’d written chapter and verse to prove that it’s overly simplistic to say the scouts need to get off their backside… with a ‘well obviously’ comment.

That was it. It was nothing.

And then you piled in, threw a massive tantrum and wondered why you got some back.

You also decided to try and pick holes in my point and then, when you realised I can easily reject those points with logic, you made it personal.

Embarrassing and I expect better from you, tbh.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Make it personal? Dear lord, you have no lack of self-awareness. You insulted another poster's intelligence, then started playing the victim card when you get some stick back. Same old Winston. Never your fault. You made a tw@t of yourself over some perceived slight that wasn't even intended.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

What post did I write that meant you felt the need to jump in and insult me?

Please do explain what justification you have for your behaviour and why I’m the reason you can’t control yourself.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

When you started throwing a hissy fit at a perceived slight and I could see another good thread getting ruined by you. We can all see it coming a mile off.

Anyway, time for some FIFA for me. Goodnight.

comment by Elvis (U7425)
posted 15 seconds ago
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Elvis (U7425)
posted 36 seconds ago
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 7 minutes ago
comment by Elvis (U7425)
posted 13 seconds ago
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 3 minutes ago
The only reason this has gone this way is because the pair of you jumped in to have a go at me when the exchange I had, had nothing to do with you.

Read back… it’s very clear.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

It went this way because, as per, you started being a d!ck in what was a reasonable discussion. You started insulting people's intelligence, did your usual trick of confusing what people were actually discussing, then played the victim card. It is your MO. And if you genuinely aren't aware that you do that time after time after time, then you probably need to seek some help.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Nope.

That’s just a lie.

All I did was respond to someone who’d written chapter and verse to prove that it’s overly simplistic to say the scouts need to get off their backside… with a ‘well obviously’ comment.

That was it. It was nothing.

And then you piled in, threw a massive tantrum and wondered why you got some back.

You also decided to try and pick holes in my point and then, when you realised I can easily reject those points with logic, you made it personal.

Embarrassing and I expect better from you, tbh.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Make it personal? Dear lord, you have no lack of self-awareness. You insulted another poster's intelligence, then started playing the victim card when you get some stick back. Same old Winston. Never your fault. You made a tw@t of yourself over some perceived slight that wasn't even intended.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

What post did I write that meant you felt the need to jump in and insult me?

Please do explain what justification you have for your behaviour and why I’m the reason you can’t control yourself.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

When you started throwing a hissy fit at a perceived slight and I could see another good thread getting ruined by you. We can all see it coming a mile off.

Anyway, time for some FIFA for me. Goodnight.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Hissy fit?



That never happened.

You threw a massive tantrum and have been insulting me all night for absolutely no good reason, but you can’t apologise and so you’re doubling down, and blaming me.

Really pathetic stuff from you.

comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 4 hours, 13 minutes ago
“It's probably overly simplistic to suggest our scouts need to 'get off their backside' “

You think?

Jesus wept.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

This is the apparent hissy fit.