Mendy found not guilty six counts of rape

comment by Boris 'Inky’ Gibson (U5901)
posted 17 seconds ago
If they had access to all the womens' phones they would probably see there was a conspiracy to rinse him of as much money as possible.

That's probably the reason most of the women wouldn't allow the police access to their phones.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Complete speculation.

There are a thousand reasons why they might not have allowed the police access to their phones.

comment by Disembowel the liberals, and drink the blood o... (U17054)
posted 13 seconds ago
comment by Boris 'Inky’ Gibson (U5901)
posted 17 seconds ago
If they had access to all the womens' phones they would probably see there was a conspiracy to rinse him of as much money as possible.

That's probably the reason most of the women wouldn't allow the police access to their phones.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Complete speculation.

There are a thousand reasons why they might not have allowed the police access to their phones.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Why?

The phones they got access to showed one woman had googled 'How much is Benjamin Mendy worth' whilst another showed that another women had boasted about a fantastic night drinking £1000 a bottle champagne followed by Jack Grealish having sloppy seconds.

If it is so blatant that they have cooked all this up for money, why would there be a retrial for the other cases? Wouldn't the CPS drop charges as this point?

comment by Elvis (U7425)
posted 15 minutes ago
If it is so blatant that they have cooked all this up for money, why would there be a retrial for the other cases? Wouldn't the CPS drop charges as this point?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
The CPS are interested first (and foremost) in evidence. They don’t build cases on theories, because theories don’t secure convictions.

comment by Disembowel the liberals, and drink the blood of their children (U17054)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Elvis (U7425)
posted 15 minutes ago
If it is so blatant that they have cooked all this up for money, why would there be a retrial for the other cases? Wouldn't the CPS drop charges as this point?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
The CPS are interested first (and foremost) in evidence. They don’t build cases on theories, because theories don’t secure convictions.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Not really sure what point you are tyring to make. Of course the CPS are interested in evidence.

comment by Elvis (U7425)
posted 16 minutes ago
comment by Disembowel the liberals, and drink the blood of their children (U17054)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Elvis (U7425)
posted 15 minutes ago
If it is so blatant that they have cooked all this up for money, why would there be a retrial for the other cases? Wouldn't the CPS drop charges as this point?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
The CPS are interested first (and foremost) in evidence. They don’t build cases on theories, because theories don’t secure convictions.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Not really sure what point you are tyring to make. Of course the CPS are interested in evidence.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I’m not disagreeing with you.

The point is that they don’t use speculation like Boris’s as a starting point.

If there’s new evidence of conspiracy (and it would need to be new evidence), then the retrial would absolutely be in jeopardy, to say the least.

comment by Disembowel the liberals, and drink the blood of their children (U17054)
posted 17 minutes ago
comment by Elvis (U7425)
posted 16 minutes ago
comment by Disembowel the liberals, and drink the blood of their children (U17054)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Elvis (U7425)
posted 15 minutes ago
If it is so blatant that they have cooked all this up for money, why would there be a retrial for the other cases? Wouldn't the CPS drop charges as this point?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
The CPS are interested first (and foremost) in evidence. They don’t build cases on theories, because theories don’t secure convictions.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Not really sure what point you are tyring to make. Of course the CPS are interested in evidence.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I’m not disagreeing with you.

The point is that they don’t use speculation like Boris’s as a starting point.

If there’s new evidence of conspiracy (and it would need to be new evidence), then the retrial would absolutely be in jeopardy, to say the least.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
OK I'm with you. Yes, I'd have thought that the retrial would be a waste of time if it was obvious there has been collusion. The op seems to have made his mind up, that there are all liars and also don't have jobs.

comment by Elvis (U7425)
posted 59 minutes ago
comment by Disembowel the liberals, and drink the blood of their children (U17054)
posted 17 minutes ago
comment by Elvis (U7425)
posted 16 minutes ago
comment by Disembowel the liberals, and drink the blood of their children (U17054)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Elvis (U7425)
posted 15 minutes ago
If it is so blatant that they have cooked all this up for money, why would there be a retrial for the other cases? Wouldn't the CPS drop charges as this point?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
The CPS are interested first (and foremost) in evidence. They don’t build cases on theories, because theories don’t secure convictions.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Not really sure what point you are tyring to make. Of course the CPS are interested in evidence.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I’m not disagreeing with you.

The point is that they don’t use speculation like Boris’s as a starting point.

If there’s new evidence of conspiracy (and it would need to be new evidence), then the retrial would absolutely be in jeopardy, to say the least.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
OK I'm with you. Yes, I'd have thought that the retrial would be a waste of time if it was obvious there has been collusion. The op seems to have made his mind up, that there are all liars and also don't have jobs.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
They are all liars* for starters.

I technically never said they all don’t have jobs. You are right though I have watched this case extensively and I believe they are all elite liars.

comment by scholayScholes (U13961)
posted 1 day, 5 hours ago
comment by Derick Osei (U1734)
posted 8 minutes ago
One last question for Scholay or mediocrity guy. If a female colleague came to you and told you that a male colleague had raped her but the accused was someone you know very well and he says that she is lying about it, do you raise the issue further?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
What a ridiculous question? What are you trying to establish here you high grade fool.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Scholay, can you answer yet? It's a very simple question

comment by scholayScholes (U13961)
posted 49 minutes ago
comment by Elvis (U7425)
posted 59 minutes ago
comment by Disembowel the liberals, and drink the blood of their children (U17054)
posted 17 minutes ago
comment by Elvis (U7425)
posted 16 minutes ago
comment by Disembowel the liberals, and drink the blood of their children (U17054)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Elvis (U7425)
posted 15 minutes ago
If it is so blatant that they have cooked all this up for money, why would there be a retrial for the other cases? Wouldn't the CPS drop charges as this point?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
The CPS are interested first (and foremost) in evidence. They don’t build cases on theories, because theories don’t secure convictions.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Not really sure what point you are tyring to make. Of course the CPS are interested in evidence.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I’m not disagreeing with you.

The point is that they don’t use speculation like Boris’s as a starting point.

If there’s new evidence of conspiracy (and it would need to be new evidence), then the retrial would absolutely be in jeopardy, to say the least.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
OK I'm with you. Yes, I'd have thought that the retrial would be a waste of time if it was obvious there has been collusion. The op seems to have made his mind up, that there are all liars and also don't have jobs.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
They are all liars* for starters.

I technically never said they all don’t have jobs.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
What we now know these low lifes with no jobs but probably going clubbing every Saturday in Manchester saw a rich footballer, with riches, went to sleep with him, proceeded to lying and in doing so ruined the player.