The infamous search for naming rights for the stadium is well documented. This is not about that.
We know the stadium is "multi use" and it's brilliant no denying it.
But why do we not have atleast Spurs or THFC on the seats.
Isn't that like a basic thing or have I missed something?
Surely that is not controversial nor likely to put off prospective sponsors. After all it is our home.
Having Spurs/THFC on the seats on the south stand
would not detract from anything.
For me it would suggest that ENIC do actually consider the footballing side as a priority to them. After all we are Tottenham Hotspur.
Or as many fans like me are wondering do they actually care about the football team anymore?
Are we just an entertainment venue first + property developers who happen to own a football team who occasionally play at the stadium too?
Anonymous Stadium
posted on 4/4/23
It's not uncommon for football stadium seats to just adhere to the colour of the team without having a logo on. There's a whacking great cockerel on the stadium roof. It's clear who we are. There's a thousand LED screens adorned with our branding that are then interchangeable depending on what sport is being hosted. It's a smart move to do it this way as if it's a multi-use stadium it has to be adaptable.
Honestly, Levy can't win here. He tries to build something to allow us to ultimately spend more and in order to maximise that transfer budget, he comes up with a stadium that's adaptable. You criticise him for not having the logo on the seats yet you moan when there isn't a transfer budget to spend on players. The generic nature of those seats makes our stadium more attractive for hosting and therefore brings in more funds.
It seems to me that this is just another lazy attempt to bash Levy and it's weak, really weak.
posted on 4/4/23
Oh, and speaking as an Art Director, I think it looks so much better with blank seats anyway. Putting the logo on every seat is very cheap looking.
posted on 4/4/23
comment by fridgeboy (U1053)
posted 2 minutes ago
It's not uncommon for football stadium seats to just adhere to the colour of the team without having a logo on. There's a whacking great cockerel on the stadium roof. It's clear who we are. There's a thousand LED screens adorned with our branding that are then interchangeable depending on what sport is being hosted. It's a smart move to do it this way as if it's a multi-use stadium it has to be adaptable.
Honestly, Levy can't win here. He tries to build something to allow us to ultimately spend more and in order to maximise that transfer budget, he comes up with a stadium that's adaptable. You criticise him for not having the logo on the seats yet you moan when there isn't a transfer budget to spend on players. The generic nature of those seats makes our stadium more attractive for hosting and therefore brings in more funds.
It seems to me that this is just another lazy attempt to bash Levy and it's weak, really weak.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Sorry Daniel lol
posted on 4/4/23
comment by Hezzman (U21558)
posted 16 seconds ago
comment by fridgeboy (U1053)
posted 2 minutes ago
It's not uncommon for football stadium seats to just adhere to the colour of the team without having a logo on. There's a whacking great cockerel on the stadium roof. It's clear who we are. There's a thousand LED screens adorned with our branding that are then interchangeable depending on what sport is being hosted. It's a smart move to do it this way as if it's a multi-use stadium it has to be adaptable.
Honestly, Levy can't win here. He tries to build something to allow us to ultimately spend more and in order to maximise that transfer budget, he comes up with a stadium that's adaptable. You criticise him for not having the logo on the seats yet you moan when there isn't a transfer budget to spend on players. The generic nature of those seats makes our stadium more attractive for hosting and therefore brings in more funds.
It seems to me that this is just another lazy attempt to bash Levy and it's weak, really weak.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Sorry Daniel lol
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Let me explain a story about my GCSE results to inspire you
posted on 4/4/23
Comment Deleted by Site Moderator
posted on 4/4/23
comment by Ace (U22861)
posted 13 minutes ago
I don’t see that this is an issue really, but I do hope said stadium is absolutely toxic at the weekend with Levy Out banners everywhere and sack the board being sung from the rafters. Levy deserves to be harangued, harassed and humiliated - and if that miserable piece of filth Lewis should ever decide to show his face there again he ought to be pelted with rotten eggs and rancid fruit.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It’s going to be toxic on Saturday , especially if we concede early
The fans will turn big time
I see nothing but Brighton carving us open time and time again ….if we can’t even muster a bit of possession against a shat Everton team down to 10 men what we gonna do against an inform Brighton who play fast attacking football
posted on 4/4/23
I find it bemusing there have been no takers for naming rights to the best stadium in the country.
posted on 4/4/23
Brighton should really beat you so i guess that's a spurs win then.
posted on 4/4/23
I wonder how much Blofeld is demanding for naming rights
posted on 5/4/23
comment by HB Fashion Sakala is offside again (U21935)
posted 1 day ago
I find it bemusing there have been no takers for naming rights to the best stadium in the country.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Todd Kline is enjoying himself